From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-91893-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 32565 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2012 12:45:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 32551 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2012 12:45:51 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:43:54 +0000
Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so1192950wgb.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 05:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.24.193 with SMTP id w1mr15178wif.5.1339159432930; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 05:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.235.140 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 05:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACTLOFpgNkvxsYuc4Q60GR0KXSHSi09Siv3qrpPBSz=Datwacw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK1A=4xcbM8HO86G2KM+SARLuG2MOaHzghjyumFr_j_dhzFsDQ@mail.gmail.com>	<4FD0AF8C.2040908@codesourcery.com>	<CAK1A=4yHpAXYsBjFGJdEsOq_w6JSwCSjq3hGX=G-rAYcSbZ5OQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CACTLOFpgNkvxsYuc4Q60GR0KXSHSi09Siv3qrpPBSz=Datwacw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAK1A=4y3_XDNkz1gCmHRWqBcN5KxPfcr0JzT9vaJQRJu7JVsvg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile.in includes linux-record.c to be common for all arch. (arm-reversible>phase-3)
From: oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com>
To: Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>, 	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2

ok. It is clear now.
shall incorporate linux-record where Yao suggested.

Regards,
Oza.

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:20 AM, oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ok. sure will add it there as it is not currently linking.
>> but on the contrary 'record.o' is also under the same section
>> COMMON_OBS, which is also not required where no record support.
>> hence it is confusing.
>
> I think that because record.o implements gdb commands, we want
> commands to be available universally
> e.g. we want an error that support for a command is not available in a
> build of gdb, rather than 'Undefined command.'
>
> where linux-record appears to be plumbing, thus not necessary.