Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Penyaev <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>,
		Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
		Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [RFC] gdb: corelow: make possible to modify (set) registers for a corefile
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJrWOzA71yE0z-m54MoKwPODzpaJoL+2kw_0eaiZxB17eLGGTQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170314131454.533FAD830FF@oc3748833570.ibm.com>

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Roman Pen wrote:
>
>> Despite the fact that this is a hairy hack this change eases debugging
>> of a jmp_buf (setjmp()) and user contexts (makecontext()), which are
>> highly used in QEMU project as a part of coroutines.
>>
>> This change allows setting registers for a corefile, thus QEMU gdb
>> script (qemu/scripts/qemugdb/coroutine.py) is allowed to investigate
>> backtrace of a preempted coroutine context.  Previously only debugging
>> of a live process was allowed.
>>
>> This patch caches all register on a first attempt to modify register
>> '(gdb) set $REG = ADDR' and then cached copy is always returned from
>> get_core_registers().
>>
>> This change should not break previous behaviour if nobody sets any
>> register, i.e. on each get_core_registers() call registers from a
>> corefile will be reread.
>
> I'm wondering why you need that extra copy of the registers;
> there already should be a regcache that would be able to hold
> any modified values.
>
> It is not currently possible to actually change those values
> in the regcache because there is no to_store_registers routine.
> But simply adding such a routine that does nothing (just like
> to_prepare_to_store in your patch) should hopefully be enough ...

Unfortunately it is not.  'regcache' argument, which is passed to
get_core_registers(), has all registers set to zero, i.e. registers
are not preserved between 'to_fetch_registers' and 'to_store_registers'
calls.  Thus on each get_core_registers() call we have to fill in
'regcache'.  By default registers are always fetched from a corefile,
which prevents modifying them, that's why I need some extra registers
array.

>
> In any case, it would be good to add or extend a test case to
> verify that this feature is working as intended.

Good point, I will take a look.

Thanks.

--
Roman


      reply	other threads:[~2017-03-15  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-14 10:09 Roman Pen
2017-03-14 13:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-03-15  9:02   ` Roman Penyaev [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJrWOzA71yE0z-m54MoKwPODzpaJoL+2kw_0eaiZxB17eLGGTQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=dan@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox