From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-94301-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17366 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2012 03:52:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 17357 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Sep 2012 03:52:51 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 03:52:28 +0000
Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13so7013017vcb.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.137.34 with SMTP id qf2mr3820079veb.9.1346730747968; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.164.66 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <504478D0.4040202@redhat.com>
References: <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65845B27868@KCHJEXMB03.kpit.com> <503B9E59.6050502@codesourcery.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65845B28084@KCHJEXMB03.kpit.com> <CAJaTeTrp4cCM6-0WybhzQnH_ZDBoa9xDhnW4+QGtaS7Un3Zv=Q@mail.gmail.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65845B2866D@KCHJEXMB03.kpit.com> <504478D0.4040202@redhat.com>
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 03:52:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAJaTeTpaq+Z-K-21rht8MaTqoAcntMfd8mWRw9vVnFCU33ww6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New GDB Port CR16
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Kaushik Phatak <Kaushik.Phatak@kpitcummins.com>, 	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 06:23 AM, Kaushik Phatak wrote:
>> --- gdb_src.orig/sim/cr16/interp.c    2012-06-18 05:04:17.000000000 +0530
>> +++ ./gdb_src/sim/cr16/interp.c       2012-08-17 15:41:35.000000000 +0530
>> @@ -1192,7 +1192,11 @@ sim_resume (SIM_DESC sd, int step, int s
>>        iaddr = imem_addr ((uint32)PC);
>>        if (iaddr == State.mem.fault)
>>          {
>> +#ifdef SIGBUS
>>            State.exception = SIGBUS;
>> +#else
>> +          State.exception = SIGSEGV;
>> +#endif
>>            break;
>>          }
>
> Is this dependency on host signal defines what is done on other sims?
> It rings alarm bells to me that a sim's behavior would depend on
> which host it runs on.

there is cruft like this in other sims.  it probably would be
desirable to clean it up.
-mike