From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-106880-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16107 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2013 02:05:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 16098 invoked by uid 89); 4 Nov 2013 02:04:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-la0-f50.google.com
Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-la0-f50.google.com) (209.85.215.50) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 02:04:58 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id eo20so1550833lab.9        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:04:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.29.38 with SMTP id g6mr3067700lah.25.1383530688255; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:04:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.84.44 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 18:04:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1383519137-26388-1-git-send-email-naesten@gmail.com>
References: <1383519137-26388-1-git-send-email-naesten@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 02:05:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAJYzjmfvp7KEU=fvh06XBUMNVSXQG+kS7uG-02UnHqWWXf6zdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Resurrect gdb-add-index as a contrib script
From: Samuel Bronson <naesten@gmail.com>
To: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2

Hmm, I notice I (and Jan before me) forgot to update the copyright date.

It also occurs to me that people might want to use fragments of this
in their build systems, so it might be better to use the simple
permissive license from
<http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#License-Notices-for-Other-Files>;
would that be okay?

It looks like Doug's changes from
<https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-09/msg00130.html> rectify
this, so maybe I'll start again with that and then add in Jan's
changes from Fedora ...