>
>
>
> Summary: this is a useful idea, and v2 fixes the concrete v1
> problems.  Before v3, I'd like to see the "does this belong in
> GDB" question settled with the maintainers.  On the code side, I'd
> most like to see M1 (PID namespace), M2 (partial debuginfo), M3
> (unhandled drgn exceptions) and the drgn.internal / sys.executable
> dependency (M4) fixed.
>
>
Hi Kevin,

thank you very much for the insightful review. I'd love to get more
feedback
on  "does this belong in GDB" question.

Thank you all,
Alexandra