From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA12388700F for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:56:11 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7AA12388700F Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id e16so13160284qtg.0 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:56:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mQ+ZuXso5HbFJ+Q5Kb+K0+6Vr1PEXvH34ZN2OIh2Sys=; b=RY2/TecEXOEcYomOUo5MVA+qJ06Vzhl35Akdo+LhJIXpjcbLMLOPHNm5TT1pQxbVjW /Pm87Uc15pM52wGZ+HSclaxjrC+gpFD71kRzyN8BrLCnASnQIzmdc1XCRKc5aFgoyEWH nlnTyKo4P4s7ZJnJjcy2wbji6GgGoL9bQfphxxKa0jq5q27JFc+HQLdjXT1G6T+qrvjS hV9PwL3SIAcfXNPujNrHQMu/2J747oJAK/QciSsleZVjxBwVyBnF9NdV92XccwVPkJtd ZuHsDU5tFepda1kYiif0R8nLGqQiy6Srs02/l0zapxXTwJIWsO+eTr/mNA300HEUzwur jYsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dawrWE5GajA7BnXc0g8lfsGLB0pNvgRxzHLmcdiRIOAyoVdJH APvymeW0ciQXP6vLyeMrrm8gRDUS1kQrEqIE/Bo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAMDL6IAxS1mSDPJODJ+NA9inNHodibnMglRxGYktxoygwBgK+QBdQeW7KnrjxzoprDKpNFM16ZpuH82lsxTU= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:341a:: with SMTP id u26mr16701552qtb.36.1592240171133; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:56:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac8:303a:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:56:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <314644177.1902979.1592236099059@mail.yahoo.com> References: <38b5d874-cdf2-50e7-dc76-aed3fee20334@redhat.com> <3011c306-2c6c-228f-07eb-95d3ff560942@redhat.com> <314644177.1902979.1592236099059@mail.yahoo.com> From: Phi Debian Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:56:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: TUI enhancement suggestion. To: Hannes Domani Cc: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:56:12 -0000 Hi Pedro and all, I am really sorry but I lost my bandwith, I am starting a new job tomorow leaving little room for investigation etc. Regarding the point line, used to be inverse video on monochrome, i thought it was kind of bizare with highlighted text because we don't have a uniform background color (before patch) then an attempt was made to have a uniform background color but then it monopolized one color that can't be used with foreground. The underline suffer the same problem as the inverse video, I.e its color change as we highlight text. That's why the little demo only underlined the front part of the line, that could be be reverse video too but just the whitespace on the front of the line are by definition monochrome. I reckon my demo is bugged as you noticed, when disabling syntax highlight then my underline goes all the way through the point line. May be an idea could be set the whole point line with un-highlited, monochrome, then with the new range thing use reverse or underline for the sub part only My little underline on leading whitespace was just a way to find the > quicker as I got long win on 4k display with 100++ Line so spotting the point line quickly is a plus. I'll try my best to review try a monochrome highlight to see the visual aspect Anyway keep going the TUI it is real good.