From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85493-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17151 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2011 03:23:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 17142 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2011 03:23:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-iy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.210.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:23:24 +0000
Received: by iaek3 with SMTP id k3so3280865iae.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:23:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.50.67 with SMTP id vd3mr5209396icb.10.1322105003695; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:23:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.186.228 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:23:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHQ1cqFADK_pXv4JAW6ouvm_NPyM6dM+-FmVF0FojKi1rs98Wg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <878vn88fw3.fsf@gmail.com>	<4ECBA525.1010801@redhat.com>	<CAHQ1cqHNswA2d5dDQsiu3i0kGe6rDFs+izUNYoWcvcf4NaLd0Q@mail.gmail.com>	<201111221027.52484.vapier@gentoo.org>	<20111122160539.GA22283@adacore.com>	<201111231645.pANGjKIW017394@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>	<CAHQ1cqFADK_pXv4JAW6ouvm_NPyM6dM+-FmVF0FojKi1rs98Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:23:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqGeG84q==nYzsL36gnjBNVdupui7UaB6JOSAq6E409x4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/348] Fix -Wsahdow warnings
From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
To: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00670.txt.bz2

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> w=
rote:
>> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:05:39 -0800
>> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>>
> > please condense down your patches if you resend. =A0there's way too many
> > little tiny ones that really should be squashed into a single
>> > changeset.
>>
>> In my view, if the patches can be checked in independently, then
>> it is a good thing that they are split. Imagine the situation where
>> one of these changes is bad, we'd then be able to revert that one
>> patch, rather than fixing by hand.
>
> But sending 388 seperate changes is insane.

OK, what is the maximum amount of patches that one is allowed to have
in a patchset?

Andrey Smirnov