From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4381 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2015 15:17:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4369 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2015 15:17:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oi0-f41.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f41.google.com) (209.85.218.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:16:58 +0000 Received: by oige206 with SMTP id e206so68714453oig.2 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 07:16:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.75.132 with SMTP id y126mr10168477oia.71.1449242216210; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 07:16:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.50.5 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 07:16:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5661AD07.5090002@redhat.com> References: <564F998D.5080406@gmail.com> <5660357F.4030605@redhat.com> <5661AD07.5090002@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH][PR 18702] Fix wrong output of x87 registers due to truncation to double on amd64 From: Ruslan Kabatsayev To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 12/04/2015 03:06 PM, Ruslan Kabatsayev wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >>> A test to make sure we don't regress this would be nice. >>> Maybe add something to gdb.arch/i386-float.exp ? >> >> I think I'll do this. Should this go as a separate patch? > > Ideally it'd go in the same patch. Oh, OK. What about email subject? Can I just send it as a follow-up to this conversation, or does it have to be an independent email with subject="[PATCH]..."? Or is there no difference? (Sorry for silly questions, I'm just trying to fulfill all the requirements at the first try :) ) > > Thanks, > Pedro Alves >