From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 105210 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2016 16:14:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 105197 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2016 16:14:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=sk:gbenson, U*gbenson X-HELO: mail-oi0-f67.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f67.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f67.google.com) (209.85.218.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:14:37 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f67.google.com with SMTP id c199so14263434oig.1 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:14:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VeJbBkNWhRnFEGfoSgBsDSZxu9X0/3bOFGpFw2YJIck=; b=R6uqL0XxZv8alYcTOGkpq+LQ/kqwOz4k8mmyvZ80Ghs51P23iB8zKl/0f13sdfLX8p HhunRvUxV9rKDJIl/Pb6k7rdcXc02w8ymGI+I0dtKXAn6q8OejV0pBzk6jFHuK4gP/ov C8aBpvPoaROWbhARvHqWDWD2raAdkEu9sQ1OuEDgIeJAiiy8yNBPAwNKmeackz1lC/rp 3GfvgGzKKwnVL4BOaBCgyXnACJLL4xPbGtLBtSVJjjTdtevc21VHppgp+ujTUU0sbgvy pFyntWEBIuQgJAr4OeIPJ8OGnLaNmspOPWfHXA+SL/+JZ27f7ng5RHTCYL/egOQnePPz ML/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuQPuK463zL2FzN+vP3sedqJqblp5YPotcPot0dFNNo5XNWpnzepBDD6PJFb3sgAx0cfVqYzQSkxez4Vg== X-Received: by 10.157.47.131 with SMTP id r3mr37333945otb.102.1470068075817; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:14:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.172.75 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:14:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160801132753.GA11734@blade.nx> References: <1470043144-21617-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <20160801132753.GA11734@blade.nx> From: Yao Qi Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] [GDBserver] Remove td_ta_event_addr td_ta_set_event and td_ta_event_getmsg To: Gary Benson Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > Hi Yao, > > Yao Qi wrote: >> 2016-08-01 Yao Qi >> >> * thread-db.c (struct thread_db) : Remove. >> : Remove. >> (thread_db_load_search): Update. >> (try_thread_db_load_1): Don't look for td_ta_event_addr, >> td_ta_set_event and td_ta_event_getmsg. > > Not an objection, but... are these still used in GDB native? No, they were removed in https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-12/msg00192.html > I'd really like to merge the two implementations at some point > in the next months. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)