From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99798 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2016 16:15:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 99781 invoked by uid 89); 23 Sep 2016 16:15:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-oi0-f41.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f41.google.com) (209.85.218.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:15:42 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id w11so139894798oia.2 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:15:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d98L+qhwozbfuVz7sMz8IuZdUovDVFKXdNF50mr7vGI=; b=SEvTE8pEVxRhf0i3IZmL6nxdSTR+lMN71li6tUAB/Mj/vkjyk+35oCs7KV8HsJGb4e BSHe79isqa/Jj69JOUQcmw7kYvz7FBOdKdfBdVtcaR301GlPESheGXQzsMW9gJLsEFY9 r0U1E61YwJ1H/ozR5CFxqZUFp7XRp0fhi00230gsltnm2eouI0SJu6OxD5RUVo9B8mjA bKcaMBXXnAV/v0MJrJUE+Th21bsResdUlYdAMFr751VYRmvrVOvliLnp1o7B+m4Djw+j C6RoNA0jEe1mxVUL4GXHr4LAv6bTIE1n6+OXjR6A7sU10PBEmwF3PR5tHVgqOqCX+yJL txrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOORqb0Fw6WlqvyUh7XujhfpjaVlt9Wfn+vpxhTeo8qAjiLnlwD5TRXFE/t5C1JrwG9XLTJWSO3N/u0Pw== X-Received: by 10.202.82.67 with SMTP id g64mr11672386oib.154.1474647341039; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:15:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.237.20 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:15:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1474543227-19614-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> From: Yao Qi Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: Replace operator new / operator new[] To: Pedro Alves Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00312.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > > I think that if we want to use .cc, it should be a mass rename > across the board. Ending up with a mix of .c and .cc files when > both extensions are C++ file is much more confusing than > all C++ files named .c, IMO. > To be clear, I didn't suggest renaming all .c files to .cc files. In case that we add a new file, I wonder we may name it .cc. If mixed .c and .cc is confusing, I am fine with cpp files with .c suffix. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)