From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 72840 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2016 14:48:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 72830 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jun 2016 14:48:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=archs X-HELO: mail-oi0-f66.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f66.google.com) (209.85.218.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:48:43 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f66.google.com with SMTP id d132so7815396oig.2 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:48:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=megYJQciOqtj3h/JOF7oIEx3xjzGTgZJinnibTOuPSM=; b=V4ltgagaIBnLP0D/Ufnfwuq9X54hDGw/Wxe3XWuO5puKygxGshUK+84Ckpv/BnN3FZ GzPK544NiUhlo7848fpVs2tTUuv90mfc1sNcdx2U7BALbQ4iriN4NIaMvEuX6GmtAK0C wnCpiPCOplv1MDqHw4/PRZoPZoupwW8UDLSAZKqWLd4tCyNZ99mQ/U8pUJHZP0zWHWou 3x7PQqGoBb/yKSXCpolELvUv8MtrL9d+8zXnB3N66rFxAVDdjg+05HFwtH4xfL84CuWp LZ8MbP4A7nSOhmt5MaBOAIWXwWiozT/LgPU0yBBF4OhQtQc/uYmWtP+eYHxHiUMmvBfV SHPw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLBLUbfSYRGJc6thXogHterSxZtFt0Y6nzkzPAmJeg4rsxeU88iV/ewDl03IeCuPvOE4AChf+bEcpnbmQ== X-Received: by 10.157.32.166 with SMTP id x35mr9774740ota.32.1467298121530; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:48:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.182.130 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:48:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160630125840.GB4685@vapier.lan> References: <1467105996-18063-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <20160629174103.GW4685@vapier.lan> <20160630125840.GB4685@vapier.lan> From: Yao Qi Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set unknown_syscall differently on arm linux To: Yao Qi , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00550.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > wow, that code is messed up. can you raise a bug with them ? there's > even more code paths in there that result in SIGSEGV too. the history > predates 2.4.0 afaict. Sure, I can raise a bug somewhere or ask it in arm kernel mail list, but why do you think it is a bug that SIGILL is raised when an illegal/unknown syscall number is passed to syscall? because other archs don't behave this way? --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)