From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40109 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2016 13:58:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 40082 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2016 13:58:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=peoples, people's X-HELO: mail-oi0-f54.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f54.google.com) (209.85.218.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:58:17 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id y2so24208954oie.0 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 06:58:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=No4FBqGpAWSQJhqwCv7ki41R4BS6Sj1O6l2WpyZIR84=; b=eYnrVoaJvwAS5iuEzBgd796+405oYjv92GX4Y98BHpIWkOarhz6Ti7o/5CBaO/zupW GAaIG8UFsRECM8lmGEHiMMidt2MWu6Rk20h8Zq27rU1dAUJwcMpqPu0Ge0aTueaqs5hN pg7PzCbN9XnIbYYlLVZhmGGN47seZDwsE9BOIadyJCB0wpy94OkgGUbqnaeaDmDeP/NU SOZAwosXWk9nYBVyzGB+avEpWBawNX84XZYyBhbHIKhoqSO+jkJ8WgsHW3k+cG12idEV 0tGoBCmBFyn62fuBQWZdjl2Ew7BhiYB0L2aGO/EUdiN8+fpB1tjh4pbnSYeiIizBTP8s RQtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RktLaQuhTsIiO+S6MGdoxJLOn0PteepKpne9amZcCAqhLhLbCYO4q4AKrtbbxCweZlz9DiWR/Sae+d6cw== X-Received: by 10.157.49.100 with SMTP id v33mr1807898otd.5.1476194295917; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 06:58:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.221.3 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 06:58:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3cd38c85-fa55-35b5-8f3a-293ba7df82c9@redhat.com> References: <1476117992-5689-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1476117992-5689-2-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <3cd38c85-fa55-35b5-8f3a-293ba7df82c9@redhat.com> From: Yao Qi Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introduce gdb::unique_ptr To: Pedro Alves Cc: "Metzger, Markus T" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00253.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> BTW, I noticed that maintainers seem very busy these days and patches >> are waiting unusually long for review. > > Yeah. Myself, I don't really know nowadays what it means to not be very = busy, and > also getting the 7.12 release/branch ready took me significant effort. O= ver the > past few releases, I've been considering whether an explicit "bugfixes/re= gressions > only" state, like gcc's stages would help -- because what happens is that > people send in patches for master and the pings and if they're not follow= ing > development closely, they won't realize the reason people are not > looking at their patches is the focus on the release, and everyone is > frustrated. At least I am. That is helpful to manage people's expectation... In every release, it takes me about 1~2 months on seriously test, bug fix and regression fix. I'd like to see the gcc-like stages in gdb development. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)