From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 49141 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2017 09:16:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 49125 invoked by uid 89); 1 Feb 2017 09:16:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-Received:Wed, HX-Received:Feb, arnez, Arnez X-HELO: mail-qk0-f169.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:16:42 +0000 Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 11so191949034qkl.3 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 01:16:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a/f8GMhJDEPH1Y6xfeCcIRqnziXEQBwEA3J92ULtUb8=; b=sNPDqPBXW1nloB3YJ4Eu+xWU+61sRaA9JmzBzXUasTCVWh7mN1RUUY4feLHwjPM+ui t3wEMvky0OUqj2SORYG+Ebadj++arbLbk8d2Q9mGXOj+6aMmkz7KsV5iqLnFa49TtsjX /jPHTODs9fGRNVulDluXuv0OPAdjv1Vz/02pluuvoyA+2TjAy6Om8GUrXYRyIi1GgWvt hSkcP0QpMhMlatvC1iS3R+qKszrpPbgGWqJLS5RoiXZ6a9OqsGCbuGCML1Ot7LluNqA1 EtQB58GIg5aEMlTxEXvBoNzQjstxSDrXFg4kojx4VFMLJdm7qxkeRGvK2d5KusIDqHJ8 E9xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39ls0R2N8ECR4jR40Ijr+Cu4FyHV/jxk88f5uW25OkWlv5iqI9o/IkSlxTpQZLgz71aA05FL7/cuRmtoEg== X-Received: by 10.55.184.3 with SMTP id i3mr1784850qkf.234.1485940600786; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 01:16:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.140.194 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 01:16:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20170125221223.hsitc46wy462cb4b@localhost> From: Yao Qi Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Big-endian targets: don't ignore offset into DW_OP_implicit_value To: Andreas Arnez Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Jan Kratochvil Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Andreas Arnez wr= ote: >> >> I've tried, but I don't know to make it work. Switching to the opposite >> endianness affects more than just the byte order of variable contents; >> the variables are not even found any more. Any idea? >> >>> Otherwise, patch is good to me. > > Is it OK then to push the patch? The logic for testing both little- and > big-endian byte order can still be added later, right? > Hi Andreas, Yes, the patch can be pushed in. I can take a look at the test for both endianess later. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)