From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14339 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2012 19:18:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 14329 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2012 19:18:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qa0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-qa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:18:16 +0000 Received: by qabg27 with SMTP id g27so1040500qab.0 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:18:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=xuPGikK30zX9k14VL2bhXT3Oi0gW8Ijy5KmL3Rni1lo=; b=ECeR/APsLE2pYipP1Bf5EGLbtfHv/dQ2PmL1QwBoWimFT2nawzZWsVZKdeu004u3o3 bP7T81kadpGcWI76NNe4X66irJupT00xU5q09xcgaTXjL/UsO3FvaUE9mSWIZQDuv2Vy Jtu2LZf333xYXYDs/17mW+RigdYjHhmmlV9zha0YmOupizO+tllm0J6z7+sqm3ofSf95 obSQHSP5XLMJFnfpMJcAsPsIGkfb+XZcBbnzZFDyJ41uIaJ3gIMb1litTAwf6tR/7iHP 1O413ohOrT2w8KEaBwiLbaGt4q427m/Q15fO5fSrrwu0fEe2X3V8UH7o4SvD1rpwoA1a 3Nug== Received: by 10.224.42.133 with SMTP id s5mr190776qae.5.1339183095290; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:18:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.42.133 with SMTP id s5mr190766qae.5.1339183095170; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.63.209 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 12:18:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871ulpem66.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <87aa0in6ii.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <871ulpem66.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] Extend existing support for evaluating expressions using overloaded operators From: Siva Chandra To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVNrhhKKj6az0K7inVCcLtyrEa2qaw8cfkyDzacaUns9GobNi4T9Y5z09vCepeyWPVgsxcjBENEWKTeedjliIKg7Z/4QF20goOPOLdsuClK9wEDREexSy6KvN4jtC43dKY0ZtugyZMQ1qvi2pnl2+RfDoFPg== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > I think you should start with this cleanup, then. > After the current patch it seems to me that the code would be inconsistent. OK. I will stage the clean up and extension in multiple patches. Also, that way I will get to discuss in smaller pieces as to why the code is the way it is. Thanks, Siva Chandra