From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-109791-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11572 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2014 11:49:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 11561 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jan 2014 11:49:57 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ea0-f178.google.com
Received: from mail-ea0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-ea0-f178.google.com) (209.85.215.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:49:56 +0000
Received: by mail-ea0-f178.google.com with SMTP id a15so178846eae.9        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:49:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=ky96TpppNT+9XnvwJvW3VKAmGc0LBAZ2WTKh/hWxvpw=;        b=TXmjOuaSkKAeLztfn/NygSMlKy6x4teXIHNrEeZOlEF+8uBPhM9c2MwVTSzmkQaxn+         UhwrokcQC8wpAN7K4QsLScor3RuMnZTZZDSprhBFEoaFX8RJrsxupK4hKBWJSojwtH07         ppotBhAdQNFpvmcGsikHBqBjNAmtdIcjdkpjIDE73JaNoR9UCfKEHMbyzizLW+/192sE         EqB309YzbQJ50q0LXgSGdMaXjeRxQO4Ibuu62aKC6yIGKI2z6o5/yrU7HC7uWCZI9kQh         L7P80Qb8TZLidkspIC1es95ls3Y1lLBwIUkPOm4hdixn4kSz/cjgH8+F3BB+WzAR8Oeg         0yHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmKS31mF4JrbxOfzuagAWO7SXJdnHTbIKYxqv0SJW1uFmiXUC3527vUhCuXHISH3bhnFJef97LxkjaCPJnkiaLvDtT7ujmWpBs6Y2LOAtVF2FN+eln4kRbzDaZdOVro5bA2C+mh/tyxhWyZWbGlU9KqnLJzKNXF5fB4VT6r5ZgEsb1sG0bBbd4+wZP2IFPOrs8Ajj0f6tl8Mli89IdSJgzJbPbBDw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.3.130 with SMTP id 2mr1400057eeh.36.1390909792783; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.80.138 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:49:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140128113253.GE4101@adacore.com>
References: <CAGyQ6gytPMSf6-KUJ08eEcmCqT4D_NU=gkzOij7UUWA33SnAEQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20140128113253.GE4101@adacore.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:49:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGyQ6gz9_qjtiGu9dpUFAx_U+DoDq+4_nrhPMzzk_5HkBqDJug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v8] Debug methods using GDB Python
From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00993.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
> copyright years in the copyright range are not always including 2014.

I have fixed it locally now. Should come out correctly in v9.

> Also, for those which do have 2014, the range of years should start
> with the year the file was first committed to medium. So if you
> started working on a given file the year before, the Copyright year
> should be 2013-2014 (please always use a single range).

None of the new files were committed to the repo ever. But, most of
them were posted for review in 2013. Should they still have 2013-2014
range in the Copyright notice?