From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-117251-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28238 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2014 14:35:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 28226 invoked by uid 89); 3 Nov 2014 14:35:17 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f46.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f46.google.com) (209.85.218.46) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:35:16 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id g201so8668608oib.19        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 06:35:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;        bh=Ui6PCi7LiVTJemS70ZEBZ7iGfEUtZ8HBAW/KCymVAy8=;        b=FPH2eKUgFA+IWkFdEhwd6AcvhnG5DaitF0jPMj3lDmZpihYNV4o+PCMBu6Gzkv7iot         pnAm80teVegZ2R2NSLDlYg/3n4zNMPQqOGHLK6Au2HFfxZGZYTkAb/TXMwZFFLqr2IqK         pk4SM1zZJHefAMDuP29F/bGc+jp3wGfxOWFvWhXO5Kr5VLUFt0pCoDRuO+KGD8Q7ppVk         45PaVnSgjX8z5myrjYHsOkAklB6bPzZeEOgzQSOEgVOydSFZhOSxDKy1JlAILsoEw/Ip         Lar7l/fm9DuJMP0Zv6vRfr5AHb3WKhVxF3owV8BUPzR/rYnTXnSAER3jtOPmpQAdP3is         wfmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnKw4xpYftaHEesCQpgGJ53PjEZ99+NHaKGxfko34RZtQOZJcrNsaF930EaUuoWdN7UBaAO
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.179.10 with SMTP id c10mr342343oif.102.1415025314144; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 06:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.197.13 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 06:35:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGyQ6gxnfw6yRmMzGG2T5acqO2od7WL7-8F1wVRTp9mfNvg9Sg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGyQ6gxnfw6yRmMzGG2T5acqO2od7WL7-8F1wVRTp9mfNvg9Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:35:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGyQ6gxiD=tuW6xC6wybzi9YszLb8FUHv592DC_HcVChyaQT+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR c++/17494 - Fix evaluation of method calls under EVAL_SKIP
From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
To: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com> wrote:
> When evaluating method calls under EVAL_SKIP, the "object" and the
> arguments to the method should also be evaluated under EVAL_SKIP,
> instead of skipping to evaluate them. Getting this right fixes PR
> c++/17494.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> 2014-10-20  Siva Chandra Reddy  <sivachandra@google.com>
>
>         PR c++/17494
>         * eval.c (evaluate_subexp_standard): Evaluate the "object" and
>         the method args also under EVAL_SKIP when evaluating method
>         calls under EVAL_SKIP.
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2014-10-20  Siva Chandra Reddy  <sivachandra@google.com>
>
>         PR c++/17494
>         * gdb.cp/pr17494.cc: New file.
>         * gdb.cp/pr17494.exp: New file.

Ping.