From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-117392-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12711 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2014 15:00:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 12695 invoked by uid 89); 11 Nov 2014 15:00:18 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f45.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f45.google.com) (209.85.218.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:00:17 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id v63so7169737oia.32        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:00:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=OXbsWp7q/EqWZTio2f43zmdOuO2dbEZ+31mN1GHlwoA=;        b=bgyR46XLJpMNtXUiFKNuGnYiyLvLknQmdwcXRTIQk0LaSRICiVE4O2KRcw2kuGoNUv         VXpUf3rS/TY3lxrRLX7WyzsoFrLkIXm+QAxy/MErkTvFXVGQdfyLaesdc/3RCOeFKeAz         25ZoL4FnvZ3ZAiHK6RLHjI0c2EFebFPOShauSw5ycx+9MdrRKV93LHiySpTkPMF7ZXPH         hC5D5cMHL5m26VHfZot0veiY1hRw9A5u2oyheY7cYzPsXIySO9DgnCtiDumliZELQ6gt         YhAAAY8kl7w7jxc59nSqC6H4ocplf8LLbVMNqcr9b2e4y5cfy6XwM8LShZIm9WGb2p7J         E96w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlegJa6fUPcum8S/5eOACg2tXsKSylh/RlAJkbzUiz5ScRc4vbZzNNBEmp6zcNZtdYTnx/h
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.213.2 with SMTP id no2mr1213969obc.76.1415718015455; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:00:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.137.1 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:00:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGyQ6gwPszr3Yq=Lfw4qh7a74iuXe7iPtw1zxET2YeyveWay+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGyQ6gyc75jNBa-gS+TNo_3OXBwJ=Z89R1GrNxs1O=jykZfoNA@mail.gmail.com>	<201411041540.sA4FelI2003440@d03av02.boulder.ibm.com>	<CAGyQ6gwPszr3Yq=Lfw4qh7a74iuXe7iPtw1zxET2YeyveWay+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGyQ6gw_eN_zCV2hAC9onA-r8tFi36RN-L1abHfn334zD4q4Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Make chained function calls in expressions work
From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> Shall I go with the thread route then?
>>
>> Yes, please.  Sorry for asking for extra work, but I think overall this
>> will be the better implementation.
>
> I spent some time looking into how this can be done. While I do think
> it can be done (and should be fairly straight forward), it seemed to
> me that it would be more appropriate to cache the temporaries on the
> "selected frame". WDYT?

Or, current frame?

> I promise I will not ask any more question after this; I will just
> shut up and do whatever you prefer here.