From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-104225-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2987 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2013 15:53:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 2975 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2013 15:53:46 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f173.google.com) (209.85.220.173)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:53:45 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id id13so2905238vcb.4        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.145.132 with SMTP id d4mr6748317vcv.9.1376322824161; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.53.132 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <OF4E4883FF.74E1DEB7-ON65257BC5.003D5DFF-65257BC5.0042150F@in.ibm.com>
References: <CAGWvnynVeLt6F-QREsP_CtQvwvtZgwqHxtcS6pn58LMf=AX=GA@mail.gmail.com>	<OF4E4883FF.74E1DEB7-ON65257BC5.003D5DFF-65257BC5.0042150F@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:53:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGWvnykz=2npiR8BebJB7rGkMSLH-=G=RmPGzcHoH-pPfnGAoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc64-aix ptrace64 when defined.
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Raunaq 12 <raunaq12@in.ibm.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, 	Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Raunaq 12 <raunaq12@in.ibm.com> wrote:

> The earlier version of this patch was using ptrace64 only if BFD64 was
> defined,
> i.e. when GDB was built in 64 BIT mode.
> Did you build 32 bit gdb?
> If so, according to the previous version of this patch,
> no ptrace related calls were changed as ptrace64 was only
> called if BFD64 was defined. Could you please resend the error you got
> while debugging
> 32 bit GCC to my mail id? I can look into it to see where the problem is
> coming from.

I have not tried to build GDB with the latest test of patches.  When I
used the earlier patches to build GDB in 32 bit mode but with
--enable-64-bit-bfd (because I want to debug 64 bit applications), and
tried to use the debugger with GCC, I encountered the problem that no
function call argument values were available.

Thanks, David