From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57890 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2018 16:48:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 56599 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jun 2018 16:47:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:a12-v6s, jim X-HELO: mail-wr0-f196.google.com Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com (HELO mail-wr0-f196.google.com) (209.85.128.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:47:42 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-f196.google.com with SMTP id a12-v6so9464985wro.1 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:47:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KUtNPnrxfuBS3Hp4YC832il17Ir1blayBqHDCtjsWf8=; b=NrvJ16JFFwteWGHR0uBocla3lLyvzVR+GK3o/T29svgrsggvGW860zf6rcGmVVERZH xRLCIyXnj7JQp6BYf4ZAzhytZPkM/V/ehFhxOX7qPOlPlfoiOJ5XojHAEZ9iywGn/JS9 ScVw/ljiLNWbQXgNE2CE+/zYf5wNIF91uLHsMOZkBnfbYZOGBOjkWTv3M76C3KXMNZg6 bLsr2PBMNxxUWJx/WI+FjzZ7r6jQic8hzvEFG6WOK9LTehonTRP1u2bqC01YrcoI4dUl OY+bZT02Rf/axXmFJUKuFmNA97ztRfOzYbL1wvWbS9f9IByHcJDt69pIUqPI6KEvUQkq or4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:adf:8387:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:47:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180629120807.GG15881@embecosm.com> References: <20180629085731.8439-1-sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> <20180629120807.GG15881@embecosm.com> From: Jim Wilson Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: Prefer RISC-V register name "s0" over "fp" To: Andrew Burgess Cc: Sebastian Huber , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg00727.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > This is fine with me based on GCC no generating $fp relative code by > default. However, I think we need to get binutils fixed too, $fp _is_ > a valid register name. I can fix the assembler. Jim