From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id BVIUBqIvg2CvBgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:35:46 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0AF631F104; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:35:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D8FE1E783 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:35:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83107394483D; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 20:35:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6E6C3854814 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 20:35:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D6E6C3854814 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sifive.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jimw@sifive.com Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id r9so75664009ejj.3 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:35:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=30QIb7W/inh7i0AT8M8XbbIj+jo5AD6Tjv5fXcwMdn0=; b=fwj/3TRvtq6XqCiDBdXayJKhCGAsb7xiJcGKGfLZAzgARVjwzONvIJqZ0fBNtDqh87 1RYJEskGDgXi59fkDqqyPLu5TrI4j7tC+xC4vfykmGWamJhF0bcYx+DX4l0anozhfj4P Neac80xS9+NQzLy5sG1y9q+RMFQ8gedRpnm29vOSmEQkFXxHemEnwePLb8aj45604Zm+ 86dKSD4jun409FPHarXmTlzvbXz6WYL6uCsenzEXY4MogKA6yw3RW6dXc2/OB88EXtNg sZFcLsUNu67iXKqJCbq1al0PjTQIZsHd4r5bp4mnB8N4spA8G2glqdcNOj6XCOSvOCYx z63w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=30QIb7W/inh7i0AT8M8XbbIj+jo5AD6Tjv5fXcwMdn0=; b=KRMlQC6YhqOAyp5rJNWaoJGH1b29yCCblvsuJxqUAihgFru9i+ZLaOBzTwI7cuCSGJ HvfmH/tgqLLMO3S7HVLahYlccZrd+BxQ8HKZoUUiA2ypuhEnVNHuzO0ljxMja6YshE9w hXOk7Z66sld1Zm6a9ahXwbxu5aHiL1hDS0vwSAjTqeNXqFsBZGCqiNXiH+sUQHhkeMul 4CUzppLFq4gJlL4pep1Lah/SG2Efly+nHG459MOgD+/kXo0ybBEI5E1EEvhZ92GeCXSE wrrsUzeVvPgL8gcSNsjGXKjSSroS7Mj2IFtJHmJq9uf+Hy8W+bdCzUsyoXEC5XcdmWzC cZLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532E28Wk5ITQ2aZDxMwv4xUTVJ//l2hiz4ZznlZCeWAd/5eFaTQj 2OJPn3KaoSYHd+G+xVhh9zWtNEauHGP6OW3EfLvDjQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwH1BLY+H6zoO+tmUFy7cmu8TBoDNDRE4/MZi062pE1WvXmuA1j2ahoKwP5Ua6zyTVd8fvwbV75Xrsrk0sGLOI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d922:: with SMTP id rn2mr6256047ejb.165.1619210140703; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:35:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210417175831.16413-1-jimw@sifive.com> <20210417175831.16413-10-jimw@sifive.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jim Wilson Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:35:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/24] RISC-V sim: Fix syscall fallback. To: Jim Wilson , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Kito Cheng Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 8:24 PM Mike Frysinger wrote: > i'm hoping we can avoid forking the syscall handling logic by implementing > all > the syscalls you want in the common code, thus this particular patch > wouldn't > be necessary. i'm not 100% confident we can get there, but i think it's > worth > trying. > OK. That sounds reasonable. Jim