From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 460 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2019 17:26:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 444 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2019 17:26:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-ua1-f41.google.com Received: from mail-ua1-f41.google.com (HELO mail-ua1-f41.google.com) (209.85.222.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:26:17 +0000 Received: by mail-ua1-f41.google.com with SMTP id c5so12599482uaq.7 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:26:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j804c2AqLHozBlQ8iME4Px70phnqYoMU3o7M6RGANlg=; b=Tx8yNvozc0wUSgMqb746n/huJh5+un07ixZK3z0eiJy80j+RPMW/JKnlSSeT3ifVwq 2xLYdgUbkA/pSfx5Rv+Nwu2LMxAS9vME57v8yUXoJiGX//OEhc1+4OZlbhZHfNoLbJj6 qovx/0R6F92+rXOAC7X16z+b4kmEJ4O8Wn1H3cQ4Tru/aVe9uMgFyZsHlW8qV9tJofnp ah+HSkmXuYvmoI1LeBKOd67hNj+0vN1RuOe8WTB4Vlh/pxXt1iDt0/V1J5gmbIk9RmH/ vU1QWaiEFpDnqJnYVWBq5t8a1mE/ZjrH6uQp1Xb+X/R4KDhnQY90hHLeCnGtKFGaAGhy rHBQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181108160745.24600-1-andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> <20181114145756.GM16539@embecosm.com> <87r2bz67ol.fsf@tromey.com> <20190223205116.GB15942@embecosm.com> <20190226050220.GA30982@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20190226050220.GA30982@adacore.com> From: Jim Wilson Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/riscv: Add target description support To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Andrew Burgess , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Palmer Dabbelt , John Baldwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2019-02/txt/msg00441.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 9:02 PM Joel Brobecker wrote: > I think if QEMU sends an XML with the various register description, > then whatever numbering GDB uses by default will no longer apply, > and so things should just-work(tm) regardless of what GDB decided > to do in terms of register numbering. Yes, it shouldn't affect qemu until we try to copy the new gdb xml files into qemu, at which point we might need to update the qemu gdbstub support to work with the changed register numbers. We can worry about this later. This issues doesn't need to delay any gdb work. Jim