From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id MIXBENsHfWAfZwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:32:27 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 428921F104; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:32:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DF9D1E54D for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:32:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5E93953D36; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:32:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64CA23953819 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:32:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 64CA23953819 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sifive.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jimw@sifive.com Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id bx20so37853628edb.12 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:32:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cIq8e4oBJl0KJ3JZpCjz5AHOrVphUyK+AkmUy9hV4wA=; b=ScGkdidg/ZwTaM2a+CN0fXjlDBgXyLoxMzdLqxYgvuUnEpTlIF7gARiEjZwcTA1KxO br5+t2hmALjPHVqkx0/9Kvp0aStXiaNJ6QlkY/DljOM1fSPD7b4Yw438r88dcjaOpL/H 8OZ8+ZSK4CZfKP8eu2Wm/t/wvU3RhVppXf3bqKTTVJydckAkZYpYipvs/7/TPa/ZgyaH dhruirp186IAl+CecKt5GFdKo70PPgMsRdNZO963EXrILxCljbAkRiKEbRiAsUaRNuN0 th0d6SrGklXp4eruVMZJW0uQ4Y5DSXLKTOU008Wj2oe0o/Dea9ywG3tHKatq+FoPCNZ9 hcKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=cIq8e4oBJl0KJ3JZpCjz5AHOrVphUyK+AkmUy9hV4wA=; b=msYIuRra4If8Os2vGEK6xOz1RvUFX7g1aluTXkSKgD4fulGGFiRlmycOz5usgRDQJD DYmjtRBqcM2UrzRffTCHsL2DN5305sJ8dEfTrGZH4IU+R9qzQfn68bOVh5encg2dMKbN kwiLJp+Lx25bn4ZUO4omx4NwSFvt1hLNE0Hrob+hpkjnlghGc/hkfqCFXKf5jJSC4ckG YqzFjN44PSxBr4iRsbXqFrdFp/xG7N2v+VZTJFDcLMaQjW59N+frXlqESBUox+bDIMxc 3vXhe3J8loNGgk6E13IQm0iaR7h1T7QBJSjgHlN7QeJ8FBDBxfPs7t3vgZpfGmfO9AVG Oavg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rVZ8FXOrdWJGWfl8xgUavizKwoXN6HHc7/4w+h9a1fvPX90C6 Es7Yfopkk2dw+9GbEhoFR4cgq3zUubli3AsQRclMhw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMBtxm3EKh3O4Pi10xJB6xID1O6rXbVIRB3pIhr48M1MPorowhbEKfLkSKfu91XDegbJsqoTl2TrSrcUZeB2U= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:42c9:: with SMTP id i9mr23548100edc.35.1618806733473; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:32:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210417175831.16413-1-jimw@sifive.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jim Wilson Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:32:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] RISC-V sim: Update from riscv-gnu-toolchain. To: Jim Wilson , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 8:23 PM Mike Frysinger wrote: > i don't follow this part then of your e-mail: > > We will need permission from Andes to merge the patches into FSF GDB. > Just because Andes has an assignment, doesn't mean that the code that they write automatically becomes owned by the FSF. They have to agree to the copyright transfer. This is implied when you submit a patch. But this is not implied if someone other than the author submits the patch. So, technically, I need permission from the original author (Andes) to submit the code on their behalf. Kuan-Lin has given that permission. It is very rare for this technicality to matter, but I'd rather be safe here. I forgot one minor detail. Palmer was at SiFive when he wrote the one patch I included, but he is now at Google. Since it is SiFive code I can submit it. Jim