From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-132348-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 97021 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2016 09:17:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 96999 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jun 2016 09:17:44 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Great
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f49.google.com
Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:17:30 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a66so63672955wme.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 02:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc;        bh=SJRFk3Q7ieeGkRk+GvvLS4JEH9UIz1UiKzm6GOsQW/g=;        b=Z25F8Jx89lpGCSoDxJT/HlWJ5koaX/EmMRl896tWmTMHxEo5mFgzPgCcyS5lXwEUzY         b8gh/RFMU80fnO/AIez/cQ9fvvjR1mFxWbYs8GEJUaAbfj7/uIW0m/6+2Bnm5G27w7hf         5bMP/4UhyPUlsF15EflLCap3Wj1OSeSOqiezWhBvuqNnJhoqgTH8IGNFFVSCwlFrK861         M/yhlNIKZMiDLx5/r+2BmCsIyJxi9UKgoXmua9wi6+VgUXFyBuDVmlKL5zqKQUVDKO1h         /VAFAJHqjzPlnH8BOGC2Cu7jlWs4HHmYcFtWAym1CgiTIZfECTBxV9gaPq4NsdvZPhfL         skRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIuNcUXDTGhqv+jEpX2xo0SbSuAG2YHXsIfbq6M4Hq/znMRPSuLlCPiRXzMwBtCc/ZZJH00Fc83sG4tHeuN
X-Received: by 10.194.200.164 with SMTP id jt4mr7506145wjc.18.1467191847838; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 02:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.36.215 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 02:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2222194.RiloiX1RyX@e108577-lin>
References: <CAFOnWkngUQXjGd27gkBnh+3697TUMGk4zcp5uY+MmJXsYusDGw@mail.gmail.com> <5013369.B1hQpEVniv@e108577-lin> <CAFOnWk=c4PxeagbKO3z2i4uMUPfb_-FVbFh0B4QZMC1aoMUWZA@mail.gmail.com> <2222194.RiloiX1RyX@e108577-lin>
From: Manish Goregaokar <manish@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:17:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFOnWknMNUoYzuuCNgemKZ1SEzSTgc1G5-W_4WUsjatXkCx32g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][PR gdb/20239] Make evaluation and type-printing of all NonZero-optimized enums work
To: Thomas Preudhomme <thomas.preudhomme@foss.arm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00492.txt.bz2

>
> Great, many thanks! While you are at it, shouldn't an include of string.h be
> added as well? It clearly does not fail now without it because I suppose
> another header is including it.
>

It seems to be included as a part of common-defs.h, so I don't think
we're supposed to explicitly include it.