From: William Tambe <tambewilliam@gmail.com>
To: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Subject: Re: How to disable GDB backtrace new behavior of including disassembly in backtrace ?
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 20:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF8i9mNPCF4oc6y9yNf=-E3_S_gCcsO_H=Jpc92rMGr5epkSYA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR08MB37148A3E94F74659DDA7D7A6E4280@AM0PR08MB3714.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 2:51 PM Bernd Edlinger
<bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> wrote:
>
> On 2019-12-13 7:09 a.m., William Tambe wrote:
> > How to disable GDB backtrace new behavior of including disassembly in
> > backtrace ?
> >
> > I have built GDB 8.3 and here is an example of output that I now see:
> >
> > bt
> > #0 0x0005ed42 in set_next_entity (se=<optimized out>,
> > cfs_rq=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> > 0x0005ed38 <pick_next_task_fair+492>: 80 74 li8 %7, 0x4 # 4
> > 0x0005ed3a <pick_next_task_fair+494>: b8 70 add %7, %sp
> > 0x0005ed3c <pick_next_task_fair+496>: ea 37 ld32 %3, %7
> > 0x0005ed3e <pick_next_task_fair+498>: c7 13 cpy %1, %3
> > 0x0005ed40 <pick_next_task_fair+500>: 92 10 inc8 %1, 32 # 0x20
> > => 0x0005ed42 <pick_next_task_fair+502>: ea 11 ld32 %1, %1
> > 0x0005ed44 <pick_next_task_fair+504>: ea 50 ld32 %5, %sp
> > 0x0005ed46 <pick_next_task_fair+506>: e0 d0 gip %sr
> > 0x0005ed48 <pick_next_task_fair+508>: a2 d0 4e 00 00 00
> > inc32 %sr, 78 # 0x4e
> > 0x0005ed4e <pick_next_task_fair+514>: d1 1d jnz %1, %sr
> > #1 pick_next_task_fair (rq=<optimized out>, prev=<optimized out>,
> > rf=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> >
> > Using an earlier version of GDB would have just shown two lines
> > without disassembly; ie:
> >
> > bt
> > #0 0x0005ed42 in set_next_entity (se=<optimized out>,
> > cfs_rq=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> > #1 pick_next_task_fair (rq=<optimized out>, prev=<optimized out>,
> > rf=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> >
> > How can I restore the GDB old behavior when using backtrace ?
> >
>
> do you have "set disassemble-next-line on" ?
Yes.
(gdb) show disassemble-next-line
Debugger's willingness to use disassemble-next-line is on.
> what is your setting of "show print frame-info" ?
(gdb) show print frame-info
Printing of frame information is "auto".
> I believe that previously this setting was only used in bt when
> set print frame-info source-line / source-and-location
>
> Not sure if that was changed intentionally or not, it seems as if
> this commit moved the do_gdb_disassemble out of the
> "if (source_print && sal.symtab)" block, see:
>
> commit ec8e2b6d3051f0b4b2a8eee9917898e95046c62f
> Author: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
> Date: Fri Jun 14 23:43:00 2019 +0100
>
> gdb: Don't allow annotations to influence what else GDB prints
>
>
If I use:
(gdb) set disassemble-next-line auto
or
(gdb) set disassemble-next-line off
then I no longer see this problem with the command backtrace.
>
>
> Bernd.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-25 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-25 19:51 Bernd Edlinger
2019-12-25 20:19 ` William Tambe [this message]
2019-12-25 21:34 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAF8i9mNPCF4oc6y9yNf=-E3_S_gCcsO_H=Jpc92rMGr5epkSYA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tambewilliam@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox