From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-128116-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 56242 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2015 12:20:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 56220 invoked by uid 89); 15 Dec 2015 12:20:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f45.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f45.google.com) (209.85.218.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:20:07 +0000
Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id i186so3643612oia.2        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 04:20:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.202.231.75 with SMTP id e72mr15643457oih.136.1450182005862; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 04:20:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.69.69 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 04:19:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <86r3ionkgh.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CAF4BF-RuPwFWfDa2Sp7MzYjF8bo1K3xb=jMThSpK4T7gTe+whQ@mail.gmail.com> <86r3ionkgh.fsf@gmail.com>
From: Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:20:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAF4BF-S3Lz=t7E8cSfVoWFTCBwW0L=rUjaH4Up_WjTOKEco2pg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: cortex-m xml register descriptions for m-system
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>   <reg name="basepri" bitsize="8" type="int8"/>
>>   <reg name="faultmask" bitsize="1" type="int8"/>
>
> These two don't exist in armv6-m profile.

Just read that as well from the ARMv6M A.R.M.

Rather than use a separate XML file for v6m, that excludes basepri and
faultmask, do you think it's rational to simply RAZ / IW?