From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26711 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2017 18:12:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24792 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2017 18:12:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=december, December, dokoubuntucom, D*ubuntu.com X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-yb0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-yb0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-yb0-f170.google.com) (209.85.213.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 18:12:24 +0000 Received: by mail-yb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l23so81413153ybj.2; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:12:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IQbXwabcGk/l1IIDjdPy+632MGM3IH1QGgwg1o6i78g=; b=rrnEH+ZCYMo4AGdL82bh43CTcLllEUj/vdqy0CuVhqKe3Cf7Pps/OSdMwjOM0MtdX6 dtkdK6uGREBbX8z9q9oLcq4AViJLPgUAX+KqKxIO/QeVBD2ctoudOA239d2l5qBltZZh aSpyGmWCAq3y0eNPoYlqyYAmrjXpHrVSjY6IOHpRjJhlcTvkZjBFrzzKfuSIRC5IDsz0 rZQbBfjp3d5aH7FWpYofhZ9i72Stk0EFoVN0xIbYb5y5NmgxVVPAUGnLXWZyyfQuTypZ 5bD0GoMsStQTl77pC1jXPK0CtR8NjMjfNNENODmFmRuPqjyg51Tx/Q3BexnezCVus+eH vJpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJCx5TZzBOJjxGNPNz7URLTTIZYW6geazg6Vhc5C6SaYKMVizy5vhR8mFo9VtNcYIpnxRlazvIPheTcTw== X-Received: by 10.37.208.212 with SMTP id h203mr18615267ybg.41.1485108742728; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:12:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.173.226 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:12:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5b68833c-cf12-d858-9636-d12c40236dcd@ubuntu.com> References: <02ad1804-017b-3637-a532-aa6c7b8aa2a9@redhat.com> <5b68833c-cf12-d858-9636-d12c40236dcd@ubuntu.com> From: NightStrike Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 18:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch] update zlib to the 1.2.10 release. To: Matthias Klose Cc: Jeff Law , GCC Patches , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00456.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > NightStrike proposed to revert to the 1.2.8 release until zlib stabilizes again; > I'm open for that, but didn't want to stay with the 1.2.10 release. I don't recall making that proposal. I thought I just suggested that since modern zlib now supports having a separate build and source directory (at least according to the December changelog: "Allow building zlib outside of the source directory"), you should check to see if the gcc build system had any hacks to accomplish the same thing that could now be removed.