From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-99859-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27211 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2013 09:15:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 27150 invoked by uid 89); 25 Mar 2013 09:15:18 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ie0-f175.google.com) (209.85.223.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:15:15 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c12so6943393ieb.20        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 02:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.176.129 with SMTP id ci1mr4600112igc.53.1364202914381; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 02:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.14.129 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 02:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <837gkv3maf.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83ip4s4ixc.fsf@gnu.org>	<1363407692-18959-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>	<1363407692-18959-4-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>	<CADPb22RwSq0iv_gQu5PSGezQoUy0ve16M2hmL51HvM19v0M5Ow@mail.gmail.com>	<51492077.30307@codesourcery.com>	<83sj3qyogk.fsf@gnu.org>	<87vc8m7z1d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<514FA117.9030604@gmail.com>	<83hajz3oef.fsf@gnu.org>	<CAEwic4Y020-LqwtNeYFXn3oQvk5fWBFm1T5ZoAmwqPSpD=PASg@mail.gmail.com>	<83boa73mty.fsf@gnu.org>	<CAEwic4aP6EHo0Kxu=qxCF1MFNWPt02QoSAUyuRuN1riAJif8Yg@mail.gmail.com>	<837gkv3maf.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:21:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAEwic4ag2-dHuoZHwLApVdoYzb+ueP1+xV+sBa0NOnpB+s4NOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MinGW-w64]Build gdb/ctf.c failed
From: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: asmwarrior@gmail.com, tromey@redhat.com, yao@codesourcery.com, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00924.txt.bz2

2013/3/25 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:30:40 +0100
>> From: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
>> Cc: asmwarrior@gmail.com, tromey@redhat.com, yao@codesourcery.com,
>>       gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> > Too bad.  Gratuitous differences between the different MinGW variants
>> > are likely to become maintenance headaches in the long run.  Like in
>> > this case.
>> >
>> >> It is a flaw to declare it there.  The unistd.h header is a POSIX
>> >> one.  _mkdir is for sure no POSIX variant, so its declaration
>> >> doesn't belong somewhere else.
>> >
>> > Posix header files can very well (and do) have non-Posix stuff, if
>> > that stuff is guarded by suitable preprocessor conditionals that make
>> > it disappear when compiled with the -std= compiler switch which
>> > requires Posix without extensions.  So I'm surprised this argument is
>> > being brought up here.
>>
>> You are driveling ...
>
> Very mature.  Thanks a lot.

Be welcome.  Sorry, but I want to insist on such apparent things.  I
am wondering about your arguments, due you should know better.