From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22373 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2013 05:29:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22363 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2013 05:29:13 -0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f179.google.com) (209.85.212.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 05:29:13 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f179.google.com Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hm2so200983wib.12 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 22:29:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Z1+ftifvs+rcia2G0lz9z9k9tzqgxDA+HizYM4ipw7U=; b=jq6jiRwkyMQINERQ8i14yX35LFSXEevxiM0aYl16V3mVnw6aPc2RzPO1iqoB54JM/0 fMuJ90qPWg/eakXpoczgYjK+oP6yJH8dFyWN4Wpp/HgwuN2pEC41EnFYa2nxHPEl7tV+ zAnddBVNyR9vjYq7pLkWjWuconnRsrynT0G6VwqXG1OvUj4PYS7qZgiZF5re8Ye4u2ck UcAvS8tGBncj2Hqwvd4mJH0vvb+FWfc7vRPUGXli/M99jRn4SNR1yazxKfKVOmNMJmtu FgKbdLBFwELj64DU5rqEAJB+m05aj+dZwMi2LP1tAKbq2PPv4XjS3J7UplQ5J5anoBTL jP7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnBeEnAi/6px1IS1LutR2u4dCtraK29xb3ajbvxicFU14vRQNHltoaxNIJvfEAD51PHgqGj MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.73.40 with SMTP id i8mr11241943wiv.37.1378790950195; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 22:29:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.148.70 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:29:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k3iqj5fk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <87k3iqj5fk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 05:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Documentation for Scheme scripting From: Doug Evans To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00321.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: >[...] I think it is > unreasonable to require all Python changes to come with Scheme patches > as well. No disagreement there. > I think the Scheme docs have to just be a whole separate section > spelling everything out in Scheme terms. > > Though I would like to say now that this isn't really Scheme we're > talking about, but Guile. There are differences. I think it would be > best to be explicit about that in the docs. How far do you think Guile vs Scheme should be pushed? Should the command to invoke a Scheme command be named "guile" instead of "scheme"? Should the gdb subdirectory be gdb/guile over gdb/scheme?