From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20991 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2012 21:10:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 20977 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2012 21:10:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:10:17 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id fl17so2958181vcb.0 for ; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:10:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.37.194 with SMTP id y2mr5823657vcd.44.1349471416598; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.207.75 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:10:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20121003135655.GF3028@adacore.com> References: <20121003135655.GF3028@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add option to control checking of inner frames when doing a backtrace From: Joshua Watt To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 > But I still think that it's just better overall to dump the check > rather than providing yet another obscure switch which, normally, > would require us to test that it actually works as expected. > That would be fine with me. I can submit a different patch that does that. It wasn't clear to me from the previous discussions whether that was for sure what we wanted to do. -- Joshua Watt