From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17186 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2014 08:44:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17175 invoked by uid 89); 14 Nov 2014 08:44:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qa0-f48.google.com Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-qa0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:44:34 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x12so11375535qac.35 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:44:32 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.48.11 with SMTP id n11mr9584660qga.1.1415954672670; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:44:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.152.21 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:44:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k32yi3ql.fsf@codesourcery.com> References: <87oasaibe6.fsf@codesourcery.com> <83389mjkxk.fsf@gnu.org> <87k32yi3ql.fsf@codesourcery.com> From: Gregory Fong Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gnulib's errno module was imported To: Yao Qi Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> Is it possible to back out dirfd, and then add to GDB whatever glue >> (borrowed from gnulib) that's needed to support LSB 3.0? IOW, can we >> support LSB 3.0 in our own code, either inspired or stolen from >> gnulib? > > We can do that but I suspect the value of doing that. How important is > it to keep GDB head compatible with LSB 3.0 which was released on 2005? > Maybe distro people are aware of this, but I don't know. I'm not opposed to something more lightweight than importing gnulib's dirfd, but RHEL 4 (LSB 3.0) is in extended support through 2017, so I think there's still value in LSB 3.0 compatibility. Cheers, Gregory