From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29311 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2013 21:28:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29301 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2013 21:28:20 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:28:19 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ia10so1525990vcb.28 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:28:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Y/EuSPMHTfQsNc3zIt06+ncMPZzdI4jJj3zr7soa6h4=; b=oLvCyIlerHa17tHWKz3AFRgJgN8keokIe162S8l7XN3m668xcB8c11Kj0lJS7X9apW VcXbEkQKIUxwGFyGapzCnSC+8lByAIF1tCNh1Dr30Wm4lZ/jV37yuW9LJ4ffXuiZ6ybr /oG2cxblW9jEKewcDFDdSxCCsL0VrG4TxuTGIKmO+piZ4fG8odgbB0DYw4UeJvDi5l+O VP4bjClDftWxJzIGCtvNC5vsChYHZc3JP2/gne7n4/xOKZY471MYEjo5eMMvS/+ltoGc GxsFctxGVht8NMRrvHrYXI7zGNepeOrkgJF0B1HQi/6495U7jku/u43k8GRMJjAuD4MQ UzJQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.231.36 with SMTP id td4mr17911528vdc.92.1370467697105; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.189.74 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:28:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51A0D2EC.80209@redhat.com> References: <51A0D2EC.80209@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch] Fix 64x32 handling in gdbserver/linux-x86-low.c:ps_get_thread_area From: Doug Evans To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqqVY3X5aBg8BLWXeV5vunM8xmOiF4TfogrH5w9MA9kLzHpeNOhndgpVR1coegLU3cc+3Tgwz/100CD8PTAk6HlTDCvUlNzQ4a9RE9qtNiSGDGyE82HC+Em2Io2tNQPbYPoilW7E0engA8UoD0HbI/qVId/CFTgDdYg9mOtK30XVSQ+UxakwcSZc38ow0UaRhIp0HnmbYvz/ItQtGsiTrQjCU1Sw== X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > Fun. Thanks for the detailed analysis. > > On 05/25/2013 02:25 AM, Doug Evans wrote: > >> - *(int *)base = desc[1]; >> + /* Ensure we properly extend the value to 64-bits for x86_64. */ >> + *base = (void*) (uintptr_t) desc[1]; > > missing space: 'void *'. > > Otherwise OK. > > Thanks, > -- > Pedro Alves Patch committed to 7.6 branch as well (and 7.6 wiki updated).