From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2282 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2013 20:15:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2270 invoked by uid 89); 17 Nov 2013 20:15:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-vb0-f41.google.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-vb0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 20:15:16 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id w8so4179425vbj.0 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 12:15:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NzCIsabwpiWJQVRLe1egwGyFBZ+rrOXFnJSEQkdKWaY=; b=i0PlecVaLdDy+6ob8mP5A6dRGjNNUrUpCBgDuSIofeY+1RJ9QUEYEzC17JG/YUFZnW a/HYHv3vYREPhpcPb7tjMWWlULfA3WEAfD2dAxNc0GHatARHoi3bhPFKbxKIAl+aTwWI QYrlRCRxj35DQOIXAxJLlfjXEqRgbbH1s3qpTQsFI+wBCSKwRY4NoLkvTFKCjQxpLlie QmByufaGXS+EMIPYRRBy3aiHhZzhkejlSr0r8Eu63XtyvIHUofBTc5fPqlBhlG/EaNfl cUJLsd6UnnR+nkM3piQzbQz5d0EA9SJhfZ0yRGp23DEf5eZ5fgPi/kvFUD9WVjTRSC/B ulug== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQljbYU1N7LBB4MulsKONh+X2jPzyMlWmepoToZwlY/IMX6Qvz7lTcCBbebkLufitJ5qkKlfBE3q4ItXkhwePlXGQNpFwx5o1LuFGcUU06NlS+NN+mdJXc4KvpHOIpHr9jOTiJpwpqMhjqpIblhe55bj9dJOS9HoZqhFYOZHjtCexjfwDBqQoWlpFlfGbh8hLoqiyLcXrza1871fmA9CNweq6UuXeA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.192.198 with SMTP id dr6mr11741415vcb.19.1384719310706; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 12:15:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.163.52 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 12:15:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83k3gpa0hf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1383458049-20893-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1383458049-20893-5-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83k3gpa0hf.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 20:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] Don't stress 'remote' in "Data Caching" in doc From: Doug Evans To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00448.txt.bz2 On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Yao Qi >> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 13:54:04 +0800 >> >> When I try to describe the cache and its related commands (in a >> cache-per-address-space world), I find hard to add, because >> existing doc is focused on remote debugging, while data cache is used >> regardless of the target. More precisely, GDB caches target data, >> instead of remote data. > > Thanks. But may I ask in the future not to split the patches to > documentation that are related to the same series? When you split > them, it makes the review harder, as I see the documentation changes > piecemeal, rather than together. That may be hard to apply in general. For code we ask people to split such things out. I can well imagine people applying the same logic to documentation. I don't know that it necessarily applies here, but it could.