From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23787 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2012 16:58:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 23779 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2012 16:58:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:58:35 +0000 Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so5526385vcb.0 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=Y+a8fsgfYvbkCe11XWD+uiIEE3AFwOnlYyqe0iGGihk=; b=n78boj/N36y7/xP0SDU+MWXZrq14GA4Ii3VVNUxE2BkSa6vorIhr8F8wtxLoaxU2TS U2g3v/oud1lowPkKXhWP7oJ6X4U+ZcGQk1uqaYM/pAn7JMW2j8CTMgptv+jBAkh/o19R kibmKQy/BvMKLmp55jAroe+XItB8n37lxxcSuqWS3EAU/7xGl+Llc8jNThibotpvUAkZ BkkLxejQnaZW5S0Ef0+wQlygu66ejzseLker4wjZpAoQ+D2veSY7p4Eph3Ha9QjTLBjv 8u2ezQBph3X+OfFtEzQHPoCONtwp0iNpTReGFXDE4nIEOVOE4jdAY6W45VwgsIY409zl VSgA== Received: by 10.52.22.193 with SMTP id g1mr10249540vdf.76.1343667515192; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.22.193 with SMTP id g1mr10249524vdf.76.1343667515034; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.157.4 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:58:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120701021809.14F031E124A@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <20488.13038.452382.101032@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [commit] Fix rereading of DWO DIEs From: Doug Evans To: Andreas Schwab Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlWUtjr2rhYJf3Kaa+KX9ZsUI0NfatZKfV38QARGv+XBjmm697bIkgYDLNzGV73IMM+kWnZPkyw/loE5q4R3myyRFyD7aNWKotENpUMeMpqUD3+EJH8FhuFbZm9s/8nIXsbaVIQ2GGb4R06RiN0pccJbOC6vr6a9itWs/tL+ZXxqjIb7lxlq0JSFrsNaLeYiDAc0zuF X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00764.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Doug Evans wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> dje@google.com writes: >> >>> Andreas Schwab writes: >>> > Executing on host: gcc -c -o /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.4.91/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread0.o ./gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.S (timeout = 300) >>> > spawn gcc -c -o /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gdb-7.4.91/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread0.o ./gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.S >>> > fission-reread.cc: Assembler messages: >>> > fission-reread.cc:44: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.bss' >>> > compiler exited with status 1 >>> > output is: >>> > fission-reread.cc: Assembler messages: >>> > fission-reread.cc:44: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.bss' >>> > >>> > gdb compile failed, fission-reread.cc: Assembler messages: >>> > fission-reread.cc:44: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.bss' >>> > UNTESTED: gdb.dwarf2/fission-reread.exp: fission-reread.exp >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Can you test this? >>> [.data is used elsewhere so this should be portable enough] >> >> Or .section .bss. > > There is no occurrence of the word "bss" in any gdb.dwarf2/*.S files > outside the two files in question, so for consistency's sake I went > with .data. Committed to cvs head and 7.5 branch.