From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-109769-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10757 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2014 23:01:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 10748 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jan 2014 23:01:17 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ig0-f181.google.com
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f181.google.com) (209.85.213.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:01:11 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id j1so7469776iga.2        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:01:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=qFZ3jgshduPUcHn2MZiAe1R6/XaF4ap8pzAV+UUPYnI=;        b=L6QuyEyOSG3MeGvVT7i58LuyVsZtkR3kS4GToV6hqdCNeVET9LjvlI87JSsZsM0trQ         TTn4+Z4rjEnqCPfjQfWYiY0ausweGJqUpZVh48HHDzQfFFejdE2P2X3MCZyVL05qt9M8         prI/03EHJyeQtU3yBiTezHPd6tD2i1S7Ek/NM9fdjzft/GdkJuUD6j1UW/l+bwMAYFKy         cyASnlcuypc+zD1ksizH0Y/G66A1fm/WF4G/WgjEpPVINaK5gLCck2E/uhlBAb3HsOpW         XfQr/VxzE5b/z8aBMGjeZPhohzj5DyNBpYGoOOATfLdrptnp3H0LVSomcjAeSYjxGBB1         Qi/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkadYLTh61Wu7KBrtrVc324QDEuMO4JIkuJmarDEuPzgxcS5m6TKsb7fhHh5joDIqykQsD6QZT++JlsoaB+FehIBySae0xqEDzFCNjqtXC25ozP2DPlWIkZM5oPlCM5yaDuVS2eImGFtfIQjGGBa010nF02oQCm3lxNgvyuqHZ/zEROo4AiMjfoQI/W3s4RVwyZdGCPKvPk8KcWacSDJIPmfPYxXA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.67.180 with SMTP id o20mr14721056igt.43.1390777269311; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:01:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.58.77 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:01:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52E3ADB8.60707@codesourcery.com>
References: <yjt27g9oeuft.fsf@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>	<52E3ADB8.60707@codesourcery.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:01:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22Tho32=Pf_v4Gfqm=9Bq5Q6LiZiGM1poCyuRgGfUBuz2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] change gdbserver to use hashtab: list->table
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00971.txt.bz2

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> The patch is in 3 parts:
>>
>> 1) rename "list" to "table" throughout,
>>    rename member "entry" in some structs to "head" (for consistency)
>>
>> 2) misc. prepatory cleanup, in particular while there are routines
>>    to traverse the lists, some code traverses the list itself.
>>    These need to be rewritten to always use the provided traversal
>>    routines.
>>
>> 3) Add hashtable support.
>
> Where is patch 3/3?  I don't see it in archive either.

Last minute second thoughts.
I'm working on a different implementation (which may itself not be the
final story ... baby steps).