Re: [PATCH] Copy .py files to remote host

[Doug Evans <dje@google.com>]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Stan Shebs <stanshebs@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On 8/12/14, 10:15 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
>> [...]
>> I still have an outstanding question on this topic,
>> and before this gets checked in I'd like to get it resolved.
>> Do we delete other files downloaded to the remote target?

[For clarity's sake: I meant to say "remote host" here, not "remote target".]

> Going by instances of remote_file delete in the testsuite,
> it's at least semi-standard to do so.  It certainly reduces
> the chances of confusion for any functionality that is based
> on searching for a matching file to load/process.

To collect some data, I ran an experiment to see what kinds of files
were left on the remote host.
I didn't use boards/local-remote-host*, I wanted to get something
closer to real remote host testing and remove any possible confusion
on my part.
It took a bit and in the end I made a simple albeit ugly hack to my
.bashrc since I just wanted to collect some data.

I see source files, object files, binaries left on the remote host.
That's what I expected, and that's what led me to say:

>>Since we've gotten by this long without doing so
>>[and this is *still* just a hypothesis - I haven't worked with
>>remote hosts in awhile ...]
>>I would rather just punt on deleting python files as well,
>>and document that that is the convention (since for every other
>>file it already is :-)).

I think my claim that that is already the convention for every other
file is at least not totally invalid. :-)

Maybe effort went into cleaning up remote target files because they
can have vastly smaller file systems.

btw, t would be good to have another version of local-remote-host*
that more closely mapped real remote host testing to improve coverage,
assuming remote host testing is still done by someone these days
(possible alright).