From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9110 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2013 20:25:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 9083 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2013 20:25:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f180.google.com) (74.125.82.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:25:37 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id k14so2405550wer.39 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:25:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=SUcq8fAIBAnFekKQvKXQNMeoZ5hQLYZtQIwo6UXkhfI=; b=TSE/JW1DdZA1N06E3Av0rfZGKjbiC6WjOCOwcBlmt9pVT78pats6L3nz0aHAGoGAC7 C8OcubnKpZAE8gnKQ5cfb/SZrM/UZ3bDMVo49Xvbs1A8hBKTEimHwYfU2MOniJ77QlUv JNBZ9UBePntf8eiArIwAF9F6npK70Etq0M+r4+vd848hcF58xqbs1oZKzroLHrBswU8W Q/CzYgqVrJl2khcGMG3olApAr/906k5bVLZCN6p7GwPB3ceIDtYNSH0WR8a1C9GF/iwH Spqunryk1MDphMHmcF3p9Z/HUvaDpNP5T99U2q7qZ+/PbkZxH/rXTXHYi3bNAeIwjxC0 g7Hg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.108.200 with SMTP id hm8mr5496908wjb.21.1360268721447; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:25:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.158.195 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:25:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k3qlxwf0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <20130129221118.GB27463@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130130074859.GB15998@host2.jankratochvil.net> <831ud2ioax.fsf@gnu.org> <20130202180658.GA16269@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130205182245.GA19307@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87k3qlxwf0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patchv3 13/11] Make relative-with-system-absolute the default From: Doug Evans To: Tom Tromey Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn/rPuzZEtm2Oai2bOFiHFWX07pUY3so2azaJkrANg6rAX9zzmoZtygkgw5tPK++uKtQqUxKAjP7IfnNkhwyoOr1C8idgQXC3HRs0GrWqpzZm5kA79sTYe/DYy3d9e4929FJK/ACmRMszlD75H5BWhiHbrzB24k6Xy3gZquWYofw83D6FuVqSOCKe7HGW9CcV2hHXuXVfbB/MYKp/W9WuUM2H/GCQ== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Doug> I can also imagine wanting system supplied separate debug info > Doug> treated differently from separate debug info files for the app > Doug> being debugged. > > Are you saying this is something you actively want? > Or something that someone might conceivably want? It's not something I will run into today. > If the latter, then I suggest we not do it until someone presents a > reason that they need it. To me it seems like a complication that, in > practice, nobody would use. If I have a reason to turn on foo-with-system-absolute, I would still not want the behaviour of gdb to change because the build system for my app generates separate debug info files. "system" is being conflated with "separate debug info", and I'm not comfortable with that.