From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-134537-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 37564 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2016 23:55:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 37542 invoked by uid 89); 3 Nov 2016 23:55:06 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f44.google.com
Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 23:54:56 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id t79so18335436wmt.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 16:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc;        bh=M+/QktluUwujrIvNV08TO98p30gtNLLhsmrOrKOG/No=;        b=U5eaSlRIg6ipmPU08PLKFVygtm8bPzCztoW2LXPkRTOkoTDeDQfFYEljezNi4+79lF         IB7rieJBx1vbAojdWQWnvOM0t9SLlm9a+2n2678fj/wuTUmH0LHetVLWfxCJX4R5vfWh         7So4NyygRNKkbXLBlmY1hyqmN1BdkPwxjy4cE+B2bt2ocByCHFQRsOEwMgwfUfoTqldo         7/Oalrc0FHvdE7zUZcfnjrREr+YbtgJ1qACaXYwKcmYOHpOFstfJhkMFZaK/yZYT8J/Z         5w4NvgZXUaQ1p3EITPiKmDDMXTP/96S+Zr6rkBfUvtxLUUakDv4lLt9iuHcW/Uoub24u         LuAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfrZJP1NeO9/8ClVqSqzyTw83QeMllZ+YV3wokWT4cr+0RgEwr3WeqQDkkd557jNHwjjl1AeQQs46YSdwKi
X-Received: by 10.28.31.23 with SMTP id f23mr440914wmf.94.1478217294405; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 16:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.152.70 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <83y410l6wa.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <94eb2c1121f421b06405406923b6@google.com> <83zilgl8zt.fsf@gnu.org> <CADPb22QnnuHuG+sC=rg5HUJP2L_m1P_J7TTFLv0H-KDd6tON=A@mail.gmail.com> <83y410l6wa.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 23:55:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22TETj2o19MZw2GYby1Swe=4RFeT2r1HvKbxfZz8Nv7euQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] Fix lazy string type docs
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
>> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:30:39 -0700
>> Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>  > Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 17:46:28 +0000
>>  > From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
>>  >
>>  > +Return the type of a character in @var{lazy-string}.
>>
>>  Hmm... what is "type of a character" in this context?
>>
>>  I have no comments to the markup or the text.
>>
>>  Thanks.
>>
>> Consider char vs wchar_t.
>> e.g.,
>> #include <stddef.h>
>> char foo[] = "bar";
>> wchar_t wide_foo[] = L"bar";
>
> So maybe it would be more clear to say "the type of characters",
> plural?  And perhaps give an example or two of what types these could
> be?

Or how about "the type of an element in the string" ?