From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15914 invoked by alias); 2 May 2012 18:15:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 15905 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2012 18:15:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vb0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 18:15:25 +0000 Received: by vbbey12 with SMTP id ey12so862645vbb.0 for ; Wed, 02 May 2012 11:15:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record :x-gm-message-state; bh=4No4Ty0cOFJb5u900KYmgUQIGrO5sK+xr5QoLIYm2CY=; b=H9lrbltnIs9wWb2Cz3pBl+a4vovmxTvApR9ZVLCRMwoXFE2ruLpej0q5l8oE9b8jAF frZKMsshJzlrQEpdPITML32Zwu7aJkQubeMMVuHAezfZEz1nT6w5QXVQi7eT/M4PM39s c0gKQx4hZUaMwlQEHdWX6hFlXAyKrnYMir+ovYf6fR6yhbPG35OrTAgH1jOS2/xI4d1M fESxYz50Wl3D3kQDyXG12mIipsCQ5lTywNRveROI/cpiOb+LW4qV8QAWyG7Og10ulzTK Umq5J5vi7+YzVDrQAbYn5XyGwiXEKJnLrdkReZSMMvflL6NM+KyTHv6DmZ4UuVXN/8fA 31DA== Received: by 10.52.73.132 with SMTP id l4mr25338021vdv.4.1335982524985; Wed, 02 May 2012 11:15:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.73.132 with SMTP id l4mr25338008vdv.4.1335982524913; Wed, 02 May 2012 11:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.165.2 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2012 11:15:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <831unms3jy.fsf@gnu.org> <4F8F187D.3050402@redhat.com> <878vhsojgd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87sjfyi5rj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87lilmh9jf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83y5pmft8k.fsf@gnu.org> <4F95630D.1000202@redhat.com> <83vckqfpzb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ehrcco7v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 18:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC - Python scripting] New methods Symtab.global_block and Symtab.static_block (docs included) From: Doug Evans To: Siva Chandra Cc: Tom Tromey , Eli Zaretskii , Phil Muldoon , ratmice@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmiIRgLQXVhYuUj2AjjVF3wVFuyL5FQLqvB0LDDcCo6YBrXNhbuRItx6WJ5WtkDvOQR2a7TaFt8lRwoUfR9zCqJUfqEIVeApvnw7Z4p4caoYXtIbi/a772rzzFd81GnI3HkHvtQO/r66qjfNdU6qvWjdhqrBw== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Siva Chandra wrot= e: > Now that the note to the user is in, is this patch ready to go in as > well? =A0Tom and Eli have already OK-ed, but I am double checking as it > has been a while since then. I think the patch is ok to go in (ref: Tom and Eli have OK'd it).