From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-118038-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9210 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2014 17:41:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 9199 invoked by uid 89); 3 Dec 2014 17:41:15 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-vc0-f174.google.com
Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f174.google.com) (209.85.220.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:41:14 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id id10so6840583vcb.5        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:41:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=CkasDidTDKqMY5t5YsED//QXyyq5sBsbv54li52CFCQ=;        b=BqadhIRYzngHpxuuQUPvPtwtopTyrBBuakK6COjdx17adwEy27aAAgrzzaIOndTv8P         T5W8CEOZTLuV7mW/wC1xSBMBkDxCVBPjI+qRVUflENhRVYpgRARqEZZSG7tPAXrAvs9r         qWOUkDpWhUuMDVImpVe9aS/jitH2lXBQgwaUb0KucjhwRlMYZA7ELnt3Co/ffvrgL2Av         z2UzHh0IJivCLGnZ+xZ4GTNuEFE5qqqcXs4I5KCWffwRm/MtL3fvL4j7xhbB68TypM4f         QgFR6TsP7MiQINumC7Iy2tEpsh1UrPJis5lifdHiy9mk8I/qvzWQUAbqDV4cikLCsCPu         gLfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnNJ7j0wepMnA5/5/ZrkmuY4vIWDnWNwjiMBkn0lWACgB9tVQZDTZpP21Bq2cgIGT2YT9LW
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.201.196 with SMTP id fb4mr2322105vcb.3.1417628472571; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.114.101 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:41:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141203173611.GA30004@host2.jankratochvil.net>
References: <20141203170650.GA25020@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<CADPb22QeSA7svc1RXY_FakrsBb_qjuSYL692Lqb5mhbM5So8Wg@mail.gmail.com>	<20141203173611.GA30004@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:41:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22T1__K7Bgpmx8Le3R_8sXDYEbWJ4pQFxQwCm4jCCnE1KA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] Unify lookup_symbol_in_objfile_symtabs
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 18:18:44 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
>> I'd say go with no-const.
>
> I would also say so.
>
> But is this also an approval for [patch 2/2]?  It may be also obvious one.

Naw, I still need to look at 2/2 more closely.