From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30246 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2018 19:46:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29781 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2018 19:46:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-24.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_0,GIT_PATCH_1,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-it0-f48.google.com Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-it0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 19:46:52 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x128so3985357ite.0 for ; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:46:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E2qN5hvsZQAKtusxSlcXgMxJtaEAGtVUqMQCYUqcliY=; b=sejS8uXtHMfYPPhq1BlA9/FrpkSqfEqILdcK1AJWUGMBlns6XaeBnWbz6fo5jX9Kd1 GWfd7LrikdZ1rwejo2GIIObHOD7ObgIdAaoi1ApOCsvQd/l+fo1WjPE5wBvTBzdVNWDX xoCq2IlVuFtx+fyQOQD4Uv83AdjxYKLOrNF79Z5Ie/nRQJdcggLTQPfZtQ0bIrnkRmgp /t3Ev5+0E3gZh1C6b3ma9pcDxIDXhlUov3eVkTKVvvWLnTg6KqOaEVUffjljiRiMNb0T fn5pVOWrEro7ApCPe881Z2ioIuDEKMp98McmQTFeR8rhzX5Mn4tlGU+8I1pEgklT7tjL gbrw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDcoNFYB4MTBz3aOWnBkkMAgr0ZOnG5/90MajqKOWUxVngp5NIr puAnOggGTyKXSnGvquZCH4xsyPJb/uCuExuKoCh4rfDw X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225tdjyT2b02ePuxxs0BqzZC2/Oxpl2WyTGRFU3dnW77bEID8ABFHkpEy7Ng3Ge7zSLF8g5ePzYJwBqTYALA7Tg= X-Received: by 10.36.185.84 with SMTP id k20mr4674485iti.124.1517946410836; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:46:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.140.204 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 11:46:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83h8qt7weq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h8qt7weq.fsf@gnu.org> From: "Doug Evans via gdb-patches" Reply-To: Doug Evans Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 19:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH PR guile/21104] Fix GDB build failure with Guile 2.2 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches , guile-devel@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Doug Evans via gdb-patches" >> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 10:58:07 -0800 >> Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org >> >> diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS >> index f69173a245..324f98b217 100644 >> --- a/gdb/NEWS >> +++ b/gdb/NEWS >> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ >> >> *** Changes since GDB 8.1 >> >> +* Guile 2.2 support has been restored. > > Do we need this entry? Maybe I'm missing something, but I see nothing > in NEWS that says we stopped supporting Guile 2.2 at some point, so > "restored" here is surprising. Maybe we shouldn't say anything about > this in NEWS, as (AFAIU) your work was a fix for a bug, and we don't > announce bugfixes in NEWS. Not important enough to spend time on. Whatever is fine with me.