Re: [RFA] Re: Python: add field access by name and standard python mapping methods to gdb.Type

[Doug Evans <dje@google.com>]

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Below is an update with the various comments addressed.
> >
> > Hi.  This email is for just a couple of formatting nits.
> >
> >> 2011-09-15  Paul Koning  <paul_koning@dell.com>
> >>
> >>        * python/py-type.c (make_fielditem, typy_field_names, typy_items,
> >>        typy_length, typy_get, typy_has_key, typy_make_iter,
> >>        typy_iterkeys, typy_iteritems, typy_itervalues, typy_iter,
> >>        typy_iterator_iter, typy_iterator_iternext,
> >>        typy_iterator_dealloc): : New functions to implement standard
> >>        Python mapping methods on gdb.Type object.
> >>        (gdb.TypeIterator): New Python type.
> >>        * python/python-internal.h (gdbpy_iter_kind): New enum.
> >>        * doc/gdb.texinfo (gdb.Type): Document field access by dictionary
> >>        key syntax.
> >
> > Technically speaking, the rule is you can't extend a parenthesized name list
> > over multiple lines.  At least that's the rule I've been asked to follow.
> > I'd like to see some flexibility here, and I'm not asking you change this here.
> > Just pointing it out.
> >
> >> +/* Helper function for Type standard mapping methods.  Returns a
> >> +   Python object for field i of the type.  "kind" specifies what to
> >> +   return: the name of the field, a gdb.Field object corresponding to
> >> +   the field, or a tuple consisting of field name and gdb.Field
> >> +   object.  */
> >> +static PyObject *
> >> +make_fielditem (struct type *type, int i, enum gdbpy_iter_kind kind)
> >
> > For functions the coding standards say to have a blank line between
> > its comment and definition.
> > I realize parts of gdb don't follow this rule, but this rule I like :-),
> > it is documented, and I'd like to not make things worse.
> >
> > This needs to be fixed in several places.
>
> I've fixed both -- the ChangeLog is now formatted according to an earlier example I see in ChangeLog.
>
> Ok to commit?
>
>        paul
>
> 2011-09-26  Paul Koning  <paul_koning@dell.com>
>
>        * python/py-type.c (make_fielditem, typy_field_names, typy_items)
>        (typy_length, typy_get, typy_has_key, typy_make_iter)
>        (typy_iterkeys, typy_iteritems, typy_itervalues, typy_iter)
>        (typy_iterator_iter, typy_iterator_iternext)
>        (typy_iterator_dealloc): : New functions to implement standard
>        Python mapping methods on gdb.Type object.
>        (gdb.TypeIterator): New Python type.
>        * python/python-internal.h (gdbpy_iter_kind): New enum.
>        * doc/gdb.texinfo (gdb.Type): Document field access by dictionary
>        key syntax.
>
> 2011-09-26  Paul Koning  <paul_koning@dell.com>
>
>        * gdb.python/py-type.c (enum E): New.
>        * gdb.python/py-type.exp (test_fields): Add tests for Python
>        mapping access to fields.
>        (test_enums): New test for field access on enums.

Blech, sorry for the dup.

One changelog entry has two colons (::), but other than that
it's ok by me.  Thanks!