From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-118299-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23667 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2014 19:57:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 23652 invoked by uid 89); 13 Dec 2014 19:57:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-vc0-f181.google.com
Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f181.google.com) (209.85.220.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 19:57:37 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id le20so4561638vcb.12        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:57:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=VtQEZS3SX55TNgnY5l6qHZpsf90PN1+mpC6Zq3ECh9s=;        b=FTPCjveIEOm6xGSXGYaHO8FqOrtTHowX//zm4+O0rACX1I3uNcxZICaQmmurxWOfMF         uQIPexN27h9rsSWReXO4J2f41srpFoEbeK4eTrYbF/alTVAtXAan7tu0i6j2TQSybI17         trsQ8flC95eJauKpCWIh+ZKZJMe88fnk0BMjnAQnCcdXL4fBTVut+P8jVX7khvaftc5q         7n2po5hI2wcidPeYQ6sdiFv4QoNwFL8JL4xJ9rhHvbGieVvBCO7D0g/if2/LZYaOD2Mv         zXVCgGG4UoDkBRLVMbM/Dd1I+wyKx+mgbVMcvDxeg8KWauCzpTsDD6E03AF8yw7qWi6k         zCkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnoKpnnYWZKdpvDH143krI+ZZZ7E9tddNH2iKlBWUSjjM+TN13gE7HCa7rwlpFWJSI6mxOQ
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.242.75 with SMTP id wo11mr11367665vdc.82.1418500655563; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:57:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.114.101 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:57:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141213185647.GA14208@host2.jankratochvil.net>
References: <83mw6sq941.fsf@gnu.org>	<CADPb22SpZAozZmtq+QMwndmi2mZpD2QF221ZpLSszr0cS0+gEw@mail.gmail.com>	<20141213185647.GA14208@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 19:57:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22Sjb+mgnp3fm06VPZLE_1u-iOStA-VcuHZAhPyBJB0R_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: path to find libcc1.so?
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00332.txt.bz2

On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 01:22:38 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
>> I was reading the new "compile" code and a question occurred to me.
>> Do we want to give the user a parameter to specify the path of libcc1.so?
>> (say if it's in a non-standard location)
>> Or is the plan to tell users to use existing mechanisms
>> (LD_LIBRARY_PATH, et.al.)?
>
> It is assumed + I use $LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>
> I find the GDB compile project is at much too early stage than to care about
> this.

Early adopters and those who want to contribute may find it preferable
to use, e.g., ~/.gdbinit.

If this is something we eventually want to do, doing it now will help
people we want/need.

Plus it's, what, 10 lines of (real) code?