From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7615 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2011 03:20:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 7604 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2011 03:20:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:19:59 +0000 Received: by vws14 with SMTP id 14so506660vws.0 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:19:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.68.240 with SMTP id z16mr47461657vdt.120.1321413598573; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:19:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.68.240 with SMTP id z16mr47461643vdt.120.1321413598484; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:19:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.96.2 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:19:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EC31FBA.9050706@codesourcery.com> References: <20111028221459.GA28467@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111104074543.GA13839@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4EC31FBA.9050706@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal From: Doug Evans To: Yao Qi Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00413.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 11/15/2011 05:10 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: >> Here is the final revision. >> >> I plan to commit this sometime this week, barring objections or >> comments; after the doc patch (forthcoming) is approved. > > Tom, > I tried to apply this patch to FSF trunk, but there are some conflicts > in breakpoint.c, valprint.c and symtab.c. =A0Conflicts in the first two > files are trivial to me, but conflict in symtab.c isn't. =A0I noticed Jan > and Pierre must have applied this patch, but I wonder how that happen. Yeah, I tried to apply it too. I want to see if it helps with how I should approach some performance concerns (short of a symbol table rewrite). It applies ok if you check out the tree when Tom made the patch, 2011-11-10. E.g., cvs co -D2011-11-10 gdb But then you miss out on some recent changes of course. I'm all for getting this into 7.4 btw.