From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20499 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2011 17:25:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 20487 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2011 17:25:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qw0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:25:13 +0000 Received: by qady1 with SMTP id y1so510591qad.0 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:25:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.17.148 with SMTP id s20mr11343722qaa.55.1322069112374; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:25:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.17.148 with SMTP id s20mr11343698qaa.55.1322069112154; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:25:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.6.76 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:25:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201111221120.06244.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <878vn88fw3.fsf@gmail.com> <201111221027.52484.vapier@gentoo.org> <20111122160539.GA22283@adacore.com> <201111221120.06244.vapier@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/348] Fix -Wsahdow warnings From: Doug Evans To: Mike Frysinger Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Andrey Smirnov , Marek Polacek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > your ChangeLogs are also incorrect. =A0it should not be: >> > =A0 =A0 * bcache.c (expand_hash_table): Fix -Wshadow warnings. >> > >> > but rather: >> > =A0 =A0 * bcache.c (expand_hash_table): Rename bcache to cache. >> >> I'm 50/50 on this. I don't mind either way. What do others think? >> Is that really that important that we must create boring extra work >> for Andrey? > > it's my understanding that the GNU changelog style is "document what chan= ged" > and not "why". =A0i think that's largely stupid, but i'm not the one in c= ontrol > of said policy. For little things like this, at least for those that are internal to a func= tion, I've seen a lot of leeway and I think that's ok. fwiw.