From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10187 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2013 23:18:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10161 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jul 2013 23:18:50 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-qe0-f48.google.com) (209.85.128.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:18:49 +0000 Received: by mail-qe0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 2so2690364qea.21 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:18:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Gp/LRf9WeSBWRdxDNY1X8D3mnVLU7u0nKKI/wALj0mY=; b=ivUretMsjCdZ6YUiFBKHarYZCVP46/Kv91fc+ouTnPqNVbYw595LuM9mtrBuvlGXST av/c7XyPalhxgrk8SCdFxaRQkna8bDZk1r6qxCJOYpy4Y0BiNUzur42VMiS6JZiz5OTc ZxmjgYlYm8+NaYnUkpUVzOXRbCtqDSXhGZaZNUr1ABoIh6BRSE08+KYUcuJ0SQJHDznv wBqp8S/vJCmGI6w/Sv3CbUgCKg3F2TpLGF8fxFGrhPM68cDRbO4MBktzJ4s1D4rOTVeE 7gD0JpUgNkXdmJifOCfz5EmDtkPw8jcYUW++uiJxe/5qhRPqrQ0MrcyVwr1vGMsNqOOd fuUQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.13.40 with SMTP id e8mr19433302qec.79.1374275922028; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.118.199 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:18:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130520090312.GM4017@adacore.com> References: <87ehd95tl6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130520090312.GM4017@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] buildsym.c cleanup From: Doug Evans To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFY8ezTIYiyLhNVveepxVSAkpO9Kf4ZSEYl7QcR6dpR0i4oDF/9yF42QY5GK91lre7TIwEasL5uMm2qZtcEUzI8N87sXuQ9dhwLdty9V+PGCUayWcSe2QbzMhx6zCzT7RC7mi35g9INIEE5mV/kb+FEUa5K2t3WZXo6ba9PuGBrcOb57qXKCB07a1AtPB2M1UmkMBkKg9Arb/8hKtgdutmW/x6Mw== X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00472.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> I have no idea about the COFF change. It isn't clear to me whether >> coffread and stabsread expect to share the same globals or not. > > I do not have a real idea either, but looking at the code, I do not > think so. The indices used to index the types seem completely > unrelated... Hi. So what's the verdict here? Should we wait until we can find someone to test this on coff, or check the patch in now. original message: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-05/msg00473.html