From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-109763-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12253 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2014 18:45:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 12239 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jan 2014 18:45:29 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ie0-f174.google.com
Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-ie0-f174.google.com) (209.85.223.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 18:45:29 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id tp5so4260704ieb.33        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:45:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=kZmJ4Ro8DXkUwy2HqxFDVAzxoscD1ICmjqYES5dCtU8=;        b=bENvla+W8F33BVOx1mCI6WpVi76fmneiC/RLvEq6jwcmtfkca3RqVMpkyp22vy2vwt         MXKIVUhaDbmyvK8W5gEva6V9mvbmnHSf1sIsRaG+YvuvZyBIikLmDNxUi4ij5mUfEZRd         1sayvGBOikhYnE/O63/3KvRmCHRYy7MpWLcTn9JJKCd6HfFwy3NyD+AY55pxvhHN24Gh         xzu1G8DlEIQeKesbUq6erjUDuRJXnUnkoR4S8jdleRAbe3sbj4QHKlWRxROlLDajsqQQ         WfP7U3bJ2PV8YcJLxaSoQJbr63PsRR/fJD2hIi4jZXub8bzQn2dTwl0bXuN5wDx2LnjY         5aLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnLH7DPnU5AWLUAgUFkmyO7rIhXtccAmke5ZcS8IfmDdeE6mQxO7Fh4fSdO+nCl4f1ed2aalte9f4BVkooJy0ea5Vb3WB3ono1XsyOChQEwkXFuZwkei3Jsp9MYm8QqJveJCDcbu7PoH92cfVZq542bcyK8gfsoLP+6GhH2tRDefeBt7me2bVj+5Jgy6G/gwI8v0ztGQIlwmONAnwuGBk0iK6BZ3g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.222.99 with SMTP id ql3mr10335142igc.42.1390675527280; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.58.77 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:45:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGyQ6gy7-aJrDMHawSwKJ1km8nqy_7vsQtRUg=SZPCD=cT1osQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGyQ6gxk9zcLKQ1Ef2XhgUMCyB8MB1v=6tA4jsfPyEFgxR8bNw@mail.gmail.com>	<m31u1q1oq0.fsf@sspiff.org>	<871u1j2ldi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CAP9bCMSPpz8px2ZFvRroHcNP8PWWQV39P7GmXCmj+fdSR7NT2Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGyQ6gzYE_NthBxc17VPxjgtYSqTW3HGhPVp8qvk=Nye27G8hg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAP9bCMTthY1oJN-res0Cegd_YrMqW77ZehMjnzK+Y9681Of5bQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGyQ6gy9E3J8mbG0xKTTwH8=MYG2naeBhMtwmNb5f=m9Xsmufg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAP9bCMTcTRTR7QUQqJXY5qAk28q3nABSh0DEJyMKOB65wf71jA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGyQ6gzYoyct9VwjsTgVR0tcq_u3=abyfdSAQwssqQk09yYdZA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGyQ6gzMxiWMCYxYDvyWDfXVxfe3_Yy=6uzOyVyJ9XO+8QU5YA@mail.gmail.com>	<83ppoqaa2k.fsf@gnu.org>	<CAGyQ6gyVVOCLFOLZWzv7vQSuKjECjvfh3+ZfuxWb6wfkbMHgYQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGyQ6gy7-aJrDMHawSwKJ1km8nqy_7vsQtRUg=SZPCD=cT1osQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 18:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22SK5ajRePCtPx1oELaCXi-vE=Pq8O4RR9zTVPmFkXeUQw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/Patch] Call overloaded operators to perform valid Python operations on struct/class values.
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, 	Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00965.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com> wrote:
> ping.
>
> Any decision on this patch/feature?
>
>> 2013-12-30  Siva Chandra Reddy  <sivachandra@google.com>
>>
>>         Call overloaded operators to perform valid Python operations on
>>         struct/class values.
>>         * NEWS (Python Scripting): Add entry for this new feature.
>>         * python/py-value.c (valpy_binop): Call value_x_binop for struct
>>         and class values.
>>
>>         testsuite/
>>         * gdb.python/py-value-cc.cc: Improve test case to enable testing
>>         operations on gdb.Value objects.
>>         * gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp: Add new test to test operations on
>>         gdb.Value objects.
>>
>>         doc/
>>         * gdb.texinfo (Values From Inferior): Add description about
>>         performing valid Python operations on gdb.Value objects.

Hi.  Thanks for persevering.

Tom said it seems fine to him, and I've expressed my thoughts.

Seems like a green light to me.

IWBN if the docs listed exactly which operations are supported.
Ok with that change.
[I realize this patch relies on the user-defined method patch, so it
can't go in just yet.]

Thanks again for persevering.