From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11767 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 00:38:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 11757 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2012 00:38:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:37:55 +0000 Received: by obbeh20 with SMTP id eh20so2736782obb.0 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:37:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record :x-gm-message-state; bh=7YWiCxU/knuQTqgiJMYw17dfftFkuTZMt482Oci8ahU=; b=XhnYH9cRcXpjfTLlUWRWPSXJ0PoNFn6NeLX5LG90XUycJDcu2NFSAKRSPC5spF85xY p895tLu+UCooBwUab49VCyLaXGv4XJ7UREVEqg3CejZpjPBxGFq2OPdrEhE8ZlpaJl48 D8SPr1SGs93B1Ksjr88unTkIuP36uZWA8lT6Is7MsznxcQHc6Jg4LmtbvWSyaiRn+Flt y2FgSqVUgAPA8sCwnPgOgWKfCex8rXUpm9K3aVzVqeRORbORc+zd6Dy3lu5FQzglNVha FcsbvY+8R9kocWGwmN0fsw1bU7KFL7swLhE5CvQ74ylmc4nI3iABOG7vtIhp/kgsgg0H hCaA== Received: by 10.182.179.4 with SMTP id dc4mr12420139obc.53.1334623074884; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:37:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.179.4 with SMTP id dc4mr12420127obc.53.1334623074783; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.66.14 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:37:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83aa2k6n96.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871uo2giob.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120409191420.GA1010@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87fwcc679z.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83pqbg7i1n.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4vw4nxu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83lim46rk7.fsf@gnu.org> <20120410065226.GA23852@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83aa2k6n96.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [2/2] RFA: implement 'set print symbol' From: Doug Evans To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Jan Kratochvil , tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkKbnc/p70I11oyBZ+Uj2Ed7Rc4Eivn5cHeHPhtBH/yLvZNkKbYTl3OOoObOdhoFAqkmw6Id6RYd4nQBonq7Fu8gg9MxhVSrd1v8YaVdaUfeM4rr5jDDrOdKXSJshYPYni6uHy5DUYskS9v6pqPEzKSKAVrlA== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00445.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:52:26 +0200 >> From: Jan Kratochvil >> Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:15:20 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > I'm confused. =A0What is the plan now? >> >> Everything the same, just by default it will be now "set print symbol on= ". >> But one can manually "set print symbol off" to retain the GDB-7.4 behavi= or. > > Why do we need to retain the old behavior? =A0You yourself said that no > one will find this option to use it. =A0My vote is to have the new > behavior as the only one. =A0The mess with "set print" and p/a is > already too much, even without an additional knob. > > But if we must have it, I would suggest to call it "set print > no-symbol", and have it off by default. =A0(Yes, I know: double negation > is not an ideal situation, but it is IMO better than the aggravation > from the need to type more to disambiguate the command for > completion.) Hi. Yeah, double-negation is, umm, nasty. Let's pick something non-double-negative. It can't be that hard.