From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-117434-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14304 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2014 17:32:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 14295 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2014 17:32:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-vc0-f170.google.com
Received: from mail-vc0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.220.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:32:49 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hq12so3252641vcb.29        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:32:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=DHwy5ZRnDHTjbPdS7pUKVLZZVpo0Fx9CcxWwcikkAC8=;        b=XEMHyVQm0DiJqt7nkhuo8DLhoUl4PgfFyvZFQ1wDTK9fE7EumMdKZ8B7EFxyR3hNGD         RGWcy0fIDBkf898Kg6u5mk8bFi5CYvYcrEdsNOSKROsf3tYhWuTlOVDXWLbioViou4lp         dEdUdU/jql0RSKLA7TtRyzxdlDQvuWcGwwC1f0Eh2xnJllfAON1XgU1MsEGRpOESX5S9         D7pLx/llRs/oSGtMjEjByB99isiVIRkyenVRptljV0vWYkxvAqBWQiRg0iYexXh/rD2t         IlEpEWBZN31d+yAja//VBLM0tV0Jkkz1hqCkn085CH/FL+3Alx4ijxtN9za//UBau2fK         xCMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkM47pOhM9nQU9KwMUJJ4iTrE1s+o7YATGx3+p/OxJA3Dpn1b75DFHS0i2SEzkHv56locnV
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.170.211 with SMTP id ao19mr7870922vdc.58.1415813566857; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:32:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.114.101 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:32:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <546396DC.1020803@redhat.com>
References: <CAOKbPbZd+ppseGQW2OirBm4y5O=LgUMP-Pf8=RF00hnPOuMutw@mail.gmail.com>	<201411071727.sA7HRNIQ007851@d03av02.boulder.ibm.com>	<CAOKbPbY24zgvHdmAYQvR6H=sCsF6ixzwvwdbhPpBkcdcsMotiw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAOKbPbaa2jZonzn-tcH9C8ge5AVUJHJeREwWNLOokFqr7dd6vw@mail.gmail.com>	<CADPb22R+QxbZGHJxi1nC_idq3NmOnaDmGS_JLc_Wyio1m2LXBQ@mail.gmail.com>	<546396DC.1020803@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADPb22S0f_c5JWdA2KxUDgieeKS7tdK-XgwrO9_hDtGt5tguNg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PING][RFC][PATCH v2] Python API: add gdb.stack_may_be_invalid
From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Galvan <martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com>, 	Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, 	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson@tallertechnologies.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 05:06 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
>>
>> Plus the name "stack is destroyed" is confusing.
>> This function is just a wrapper around gdbarch_in_function_epilogue_p
>> so I'd just call it in_function_epilogue_p (or
>> gdbpy_in_function_epilogue_p or some such).
>
> Can we agree to rename the gdbarch hook instead?
> The function does _not_ return whether the PC is in the epilogue.
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-10/msg00590.html

"works for me"