From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14243 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2012 20:01:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 14212 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Aug 2012 20:01:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:00:45 +0000 Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so261397vcb.0 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:00:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=+swM4ibt17k7tjuMsnQN9YD3VpiYdMUxZx2ewhNpHbc=; b=Vkn5WEQTbfqciGsRsadoe1d26pwsOd+4reLU5zjMun4rUsNsLRCWpq8g2vkGGLBFTv HsPCSmCuu/6UGyOtlNJ6EsUJe8oh+glFJH89ZJLFRBHXQnCdNbLAv1BdKpNLDdEYPGSz YNZJPdKaqVbEF4FKvBUoGAmg4bZQ/ATryBJYzbBgecdQXzJbKwyDyumTsVr6xl74znE6 GnrRU9/xnDboHNdZ/4YZeip2sAXFGbvnlKgf8ftq4cAesPhV5CFhSekVboKIOL4Gv/ji d2uWG4WrS6COmLhwOUwuU+F6+HqmquUNGoKzVaDh9WqC5mxueDqQ9Sw14nA/Lr2DYTxF wmqQ== Received: by 10.220.149.130 with SMTP id t2mr14420739vcv.8.1345579245094; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:00:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.149.130 with SMTP id t2mr14420727vcv.8.1345579244973; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.27.11 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:00:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120821190428.GA3994@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120807064303.GA4739@host2.jankratochvil.net> <5033D14B.4090801@redhat.com> <20120821182731.GA2980@host2.jankratochvil.net> <5033D64E.1020106@redhat.com> <20120821190428.GA3994@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch] gdb.base/valgrind-infcall.exp compat. with Ubuntu 10.04.4 From: Doug Evans To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmVbfnmYHkIAQfelcg+EPfRdcQ5oL8JgsMdJjm0BzMKzO47TGYfJWM702GW9cTzk/ch6bI7ix1PdWbLBRt8BmNtD3lby8NEv5GrPmfLY+VLOX0OAm0J5Et3Toet4lhbXAboFHl8e5PbE3DEZHveUN+IUOQX17lFpt+Yc2J1pkMF7lamKCCEd0nqTYnCzonDMtgHptCOteGjheAUTblnkoZ1dYvDRw== X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00596.txt.bz2 On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:41:18 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 08/21/2012 07:27 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> > "patchv2" fixes also the case of "The program is not being run". I believe >> > the Doug's problem was due to it and not due to the "break" statement. But >> > I failed to reproduce the Doug's problem so I left it as is. >> > >> > The comment just states the bugreport, nothing more. >> >> Understood. The comment is still there on v2, so the point still stands >> though. > > Unless Doug speaks up with a verification I will just remove the comment. I'd say keep the comment in some form. The tcl/expect I've been using is $ expect -v expect version 5.44.1.14 $ ldd /usr/bin/expect | grep tcl libtcl8.5.so.0 => /usr/lib/libtcl8.5.so.0 (0x00007ff9bac15000)