From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32385 invoked by alias); 2 May 2015 15:33:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32376 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2015 15:33:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oi0-f54.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f54.google.com) (209.85.218.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 02 May 2015 15:33:39 +0000 Received: by oica37 with SMTP id a37so87370534oic.0 for ; Sat, 02 May 2015 08:33:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=O8kEh202B3eVc7FPNmfrpyJM5iFsXvVdg2jAKXIKLZQ=; b=gH8DX7ULqg8lnUvQfuef0HRAORQkz66RdgdW050r6oQJmnc9J/4lyHL7nuYxTdYzp1 K9D5NAPjLoXmfWpnFBZm2ONapqIzAweOtPvKUs9TclpqPOSXaCh3auOoGWuDpTGqsIdl gJAY7JN3gFzdp7rEet2yZqUVmNdSrurBJyfrE5+k/GT5SwNk2KTFz0bPJoZuO4/XPiqn XXk6klplQ0JJLzKhukL4JN+4TbRT3WcXvoQviOfHAy2NmLO3x5NQVlKs0T9KX+G3qlfr dB5dXI5CpZ12sFD6f/wKnnA0Cg5kil8zMpihBw1Yv6v1MuG3+csfm4XNcJKsydeWM7Hj nfhg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm28Okj5DLQAbm7vTAVYvlKOqALGdmPvM7SwGnRvmy+CeaRnKUnu2dRApoAQX7s4cskg4VQ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.101.195 with SMTP id fi3mr11931349oeb.65.1430580817538; Sat, 02 May 2015 08:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.89.99 with HTTP; Sat, 2 May 2015 08:33:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150422171434.GL4764@adacore.com> References: <20150422133231.GB4764@adacore.com> <20150422171434.GL4764@adacore.com> Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 15:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 3 weeks to GDB 7.9.1 release? From: Doug Evans To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Would the patch to gdb/p-exp.y that fixes issue PR 127815 >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17815 >> >> be acceptable without the testsuite change? >> >> This patch was accepted recently by Doug, and committed to trunk. >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00735.html >> >> The patch [part 1/3] itself is at: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00111.html >> >> Or would the application of the three parts of the patch be more acceptable? >> The two other parts are at: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00112.html >> and >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00113.html > > It's mostly your's and Doug's decision. The general idea is to > only take patches that are safe and fix an important issue. But > if it's only affecting Pascal, then we can be a little more > relaxed about it. Agreed. I think this and the tests can go into the branch. > Regarding the testsuite patches, since they cannot harm the debugger, > they should be part of the set being considered for inclusion in > the gdb-7.9-branch. > > If the decision is to include the patch, please remember to update > the wiki page as well! > > -- > Joel